Friday? Really?
Apr. 23rd, 2005 02:37 amWell, today was a proper Spring day - it rained. Enough that the roast that was planned was cancelled. It may reschedule, though. I got some really good pizza for lunch, though. That'll also be dinner tomorrow, most likely. Mmm-mmm... at least it wasn't served by someone who was trying to get fired. That would have been interesting.
I also spent a good amount of time watching the second day of the Lightworks Festival. The last movie of the night was a zombie short. which is funny, because I was just reading about zombies this morning. Strange how the Synchronicity Drive works, isn't it?
And then I read a pair of articles - one about how in any conflict that has boundaries, the boundaries are fractal... there's a fuzzy zone in between the two camps where one is not entirely sure what side is in charge, if any side at all. That might describe my natural state. and perhaps in that uncertain state there exists the power to reshape reality, through the creation, manipulation, and re-casting of images. Controlling both images and their meanings allows someone to create reality. Depending on how you apply your images (if you apply them at all), you create the real. As Conforth would say, "Define Yourself."
On an unrelated tangent, my art skills were cheered by a visit to the museum, reminding me that I need not even think about drawing figures at all, and that I can simply apply a color uniformly to an otherwise unremarkable object and still have it be called art. Perhaps my limited drawing skills really are an improvement over what I could be. You'd be surprised what can be considered art, especially in the twentieth century.
Finally, I've been doing a dangerous thing - thinking. So once again I will assault your brains with my ideas. You are free to discard them, adopt them, or ignore them as you like. This current brain-pattern revolves around the idea of the Impostor Syndrome that I referenced in the previous post. While the link I gave probably didn't have much in the way of detailing the theory, it did make mention of some of the characteristics of the mindset - downplaying one's own intellect or skill, attributing successes to good fortune, et cetera. The more I think about it, the more I wonder why more people don't claim it, since it seems that our entire society is geared toward reinforcing the impostor's mindset.
It's coded in our maxims - "The squeaky wheel gets the grease." Why? To shut it up. That the wheel receives benefits is secondary. "Sticking out like a sore thumb" - obviously in need of some "healing" to bring it back to being normal. In the news, the stories play out that great successes get lucky, no matter how much planning or effort or expertise they put into their projects - all that does is minimize the chance that something goes wrong, really, at least according to them.
So where does this insidious bastard get his start? The school system, I suspect. In an environment where the slow are sequestered away and the quick are told, in no uncertain terms, to be like everybody else (or at least to make themselves useful by helping the slower kids stay on the wave), what signal does that send? In a place where the unique are actively targeted, how do you avoid being one of the victims if you've got an unpopular eccentricity, like intelligence? "George just lucky, I guess." "No, I'm not smart, I just happened to get the questions I had studied for on the test." "I'm normal, just like you... I just happened to have favorable circumstances."
This extends out into society... if you say, with honest conviction, that you're skilled at something, there will invariably be a backlash that says you're being arrogant, or proud, and that something must be done to remind you that you are only fortunate, not skilled. It may stem from jealousy (and I'll admit to being jealous of people more skilled at things than I, but I hope that I turn it into a motivation for me to improve my own skills, instead of wishing ill fate on someone because they're more skilled), but one of the first learned and most socially acceptable ways of avoiding being called an arrogant jerk is to downplay your achievements. Yes, I did save that girl from the burning building, but anybody could have done that. Sure, I climbed Kilimanjaro, but anyone else could, too.
Get my point? The Impostor Syndrome should be an epidemic! Perhaps it's just that nobody's put a name to it yet, and in future years, we'll see a giant spike in the number of people being treated for no self-confidence. (Or maybe it's already here and we just hide it well) Fixing the problem shouldn't be too hard - all we have to do is get people to stop holding up an arbitrary "normal" as the ideal state for a person to be in. Once we can accept eccentricities as integral parts of a person, rather than foreign material to be excised, we can cut the need for the Impostor. It's all part of the master plan, you see, to get people to look at other people as a whole greater than the sum of its parts, rather than as a collection of characteristics, all compartmentalized, some desirable, some not. Silly me, right? That idea's not normal.
So, in closing, I'll exercise another one of my eccentricities - my tendency to go to bed after finishing a journal entry.
I also spent a good amount of time watching the second day of the Lightworks Festival. The last movie of the night was a zombie short. which is funny, because I was just reading about zombies this morning. Strange how the Synchronicity Drive works, isn't it?
And then I read a pair of articles - one about how in any conflict that has boundaries, the boundaries are fractal... there's a fuzzy zone in between the two camps where one is not entirely sure what side is in charge, if any side at all. That might describe my natural state. and perhaps in that uncertain state there exists the power to reshape reality, through the creation, manipulation, and re-casting of images. Controlling both images and their meanings allows someone to create reality. Depending on how you apply your images (if you apply them at all), you create the real. As Conforth would say, "Define Yourself."
On an unrelated tangent, my art skills were cheered by a visit to the museum, reminding me that I need not even think about drawing figures at all, and that I can simply apply a color uniformly to an otherwise unremarkable object and still have it be called art. Perhaps my limited drawing skills really are an improvement over what I could be. You'd be surprised what can be considered art, especially in the twentieth century.
Finally, I've been doing a dangerous thing - thinking. So once again I will assault your brains with my ideas. You are free to discard them, adopt them, or ignore them as you like. This current brain-pattern revolves around the idea of the Impostor Syndrome that I referenced in the previous post. While the link I gave probably didn't have much in the way of detailing the theory, it did make mention of some of the characteristics of the mindset - downplaying one's own intellect or skill, attributing successes to good fortune, et cetera. The more I think about it, the more I wonder why more people don't claim it, since it seems that our entire society is geared toward reinforcing the impostor's mindset.
It's coded in our maxims - "The squeaky wheel gets the grease." Why? To shut it up. That the wheel receives benefits is secondary. "Sticking out like a sore thumb" - obviously in need of some "healing" to bring it back to being normal. In the news, the stories play out that great successes get lucky, no matter how much planning or effort or expertise they put into their projects - all that does is minimize the chance that something goes wrong, really, at least according to them.
So where does this insidious bastard get his start? The school system, I suspect. In an environment where the slow are sequestered away and the quick are told, in no uncertain terms, to be like everybody else (or at least to make themselves useful by helping the slower kids stay on the wave), what signal does that send? In a place where the unique are actively targeted, how do you avoid being one of the victims if you've got an unpopular eccentricity, like intelligence? "George just lucky, I guess." "No, I'm not smart, I just happened to get the questions I had studied for on the test." "I'm normal, just like you... I just happened to have favorable circumstances."
This extends out into society... if you say, with honest conviction, that you're skilled at something, there will invariably be a backlash that says you're being arrogant, or proud, and that something must be done to remind you that you are only fortunate, not skilled. It may stem from jealousy (and I'll admit to being jealous of people more skilled at things than I, but I hope that I turn it into a motivation for me to improve my own skills, instead of wishing ill fate on someone because they're more skilled), but one of the first learned and most socially acceptable ways of avoiding being called an arrogant jerk is to downplay your achievements. Yes, I did save that girl from the burning building, but anybody could have done that. Sure, I climbed Kilimanjaro, but anyone else could, too.
Get my point? The Impostor Syndrome should be an epidemic! Perhaps it's just that nobody's put a name to it yet, and in future years, we'll see a giant spike in the number of people being treated for no self-confidence. (Or maybe it's already here and we just hide it well) Fixing the problem shouldn't be too hard - all we have to do is get people to stop holding up an arbitrary "normal" as the ideal state for a person to be in. Once we can accept eccentricities as integral parts of a person, rather than foreign material to be excised, we can cut the need for the Impostor. It's all part of the master plan, you see, to get people to look at other people as a whole greater than the sum of its parts, rather than as a collection of characteristics, all compartmentalized, some desirable, some not. Silly me, right? That idea's not normal.
So, in closing, I'll exercise another one of my eccentricities - my tendency to go to bed after finishing a journal entry.