Uh. I have a hard time with what you said being true.
There is no record of Christ other than the Bible. (And if there is actually some real, solid, historical record of him I've missed out on, then please, point it out, I'd love to have a counter to the "somebody just made the whole thing up" argument.) The Bible says nothing whatsoever about the Romans regarding Christ as a rebel or a threat. Quite the contrary.
So... you're making things up. I guess if you want to define true as "somebody somewhere thinks this is right" then sure, your stuff is as true as mine. But at least mine has the benefit of having been written down within a century or so of the events, whereas yours appears to have been invented from whole cloth much, much, much later.
no subject
There is no record of Christ other than the Bible. (And if there is actually some real, solid, historical record of him I've missed out on, then please, point it out, I'd love to have a counter to the "somebody just made the whole thing up" argument.) The Bible says nothing whatsoever about the Romans regarding Christ as a rebel or a threat. Quite the contrary.
So... you're making things up. I guess if you want to define true as "somebody somewhere thinks this is right" then sure, your stuff is as true as mine. But at least mine has the benefit of having been written down within a century or so of the events, whereas yours appears to have been invented from whole cloth much, much, much later.