oswulf: (Default)
oswulf ([personal profile] oswulf) wrote in [personal profile] silveradept 2016-01-06 02:34 am (UTC)

Well, *technically* you said you could use more random conversations, not that you *need* them. But that's just me nitpicking over technicalities.

Okay. Fundamentalism. I see nothing fundamental about picking out bible verses to support what people believed when one was a kid. It seems to me that religious "Fundamentalism" ought to refer to prioritizing what is most fundamental in religion. For Christianity, you can't get much more fundamental than what Christ explicitly declared the two most important commandments.

And if the faux-pas of getting theological hasn't driven you off I'm fully capable of the faux-pas of getting political.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org