So it's been interesting all around. Interesting in the sense of "I should be going to bed right now"
Got commentary back on my thesis - my reader (who hasn't seen the project before) recommended High Honors for me, holding back highest honors because of some problems that I was aware of with the thesis - they had been raised before, but I guess I didn't tie them in well enough or figure out how to tie them in well enough. Either way, I got praise (and high marks for the course - we'll see what sort of honors I garner for graduation day. Either way, I can stick on the honor cords - my GPA's good enough for it anyway. So if departmental honors gives me some other accoutrement to wear, then yay! More feathers for the peacock!
For my next trick - getting chimps to stop smoking? Nah, leave that one to the experts. Instead, enjoy the scents of R'yleh.
I've got a lot of thinking things - the revolutionary socialist, myself, and another all sat about discussing the merits of science and religion in pre- and post-revolution worlds. The hang-up seemed to be in trying to explain God as a non-scientific hypothesis, which God (or at least the Christian estimation thereof) is by definition. At the same time, I'm not willing to say that they'll die out entirely in such a world - possibly severely reduced in numbers, but not dead. I just wonder what seems to frightening about a world ruled entirely by good science... maybe the possibilities it produces for being really inhumane, even in a socialist world? I don't know. Maybe it's debris from my vagrant Catholicism.
Gliding along religious lines, we knew this was true, but someone finally proved it - There are Baptists with brains. (Sorry for anyone who might be offended, but alliterative jokes are often too good to pass up.) Read and see whether or not this minister might just have the right idea. (The post is in
satyrblade's journal, the speech is from Rev. Dr. Robert Dale Shrum)
Turning politically, we note with dismay and a little twitchiness that perhaps the prosecution alters the evidence to earn their conviction, rather than letting the innocent away. This seems to be a worldwide thing - the Space Hijackers site often has the Police around, even when they aren't doing anything that affects anyone but the spectators. So what to do about it? Well, I do believe a very long time ago I wrote about a gentleman from Canada who has cameras in his eyeglasses, takes video cameras into stores, and generally tries to make people aware of the surveillance going on in stores. Or I at least watched a program about someone of this nature. It might not be the same guy who's in this article about keeping surveillance on the people keeping surveillance (although I think it is the same person), but the idea is stellar. If everybody's filming everybody else, then there's good reason for everybody to either behave perfectly or to want to escape from the cameras - I suspect the latter more than the former, and thus it could provide some impetus to stop mistrusting everybody else so much. Who knows?
Next-to-last, I'll probably be in the mass of people trying to get Piro to sign for them tomorrow, so if you're headed that way, let me know - maybe we can all meet somewhere and then go plunge into the crowd.
Lastly, a new set of answers to the interview meme - my answers by
rimspace's questions:
1) Probably Japan, if moving there also counts that I'll be able to learn the language. I've heard it's a beautiful place, and there's a lot there that I'm interested in seeing.
2) Yep. Although I think I might have a system fairly well worked out, it continues to be tweaked.
3) Of course.
4) Go for it! IF there are other intelligent races out there, it would be better to know about them before they come knocking on our door. There's a risk involved of inviting the Borg back to the home planet, sure, but it should be one we're willing to take.
5) Not unimaginative, but somehow, coming up with five good questions is a strain.
The questions:
1) If you could move anywhere, where would it be?
2) Do you believe in magic?
3) Intentionally left blank?
4) Space exploration: your opinion.
5) does everyone have so much trouble thinking up five questions, despite having so many ideas of what to ask before being asked for the questions, or am I just unimaginative?
Got commentary back on my thesis - my reader (who hasn't seen the project before) recommended High Honors for me, holding back highest honors because of some problems that I was aware of with the thesis - they had been raised before, but I guess I didn't tie them in well enough or figure out how to tie them in well enough. Either way, I got praise (and high marks for the course - we'll see what sort of honors I garner for graduation day. Either way, I can stick on the honor cords - my GPA's good enough for it anyway. So if departmental honors gives me some other accoutrement to wear, then yay! More feathers for the peacock!
For my next trick - getting chimps to stop smoking? Nah, leave that one to the experts. Instead, enjoy the scents of R'yleh.
I've got a lot of thinking things - the revolutionary socialist, myself, and another all sat about discussing the merits of science and religion in pre- and post-revolution worlds. The hang-up seemed to be in trying to explain God as a non-scientific hypothesis, which God (or at least the Christian estimation thereof) is by definition. At the same time, I'm not willing to say that they'll die out entirely in such a world - possibly severely reduced in numbers, but not dead. I just wonder what seems to frightening about a world ruled entirely by good science... maybe the possibilities it produces for being really inhumane, even in a socialist world? I don't know. Maybe it's debris from my vagrant Catholicism.
Gliding along religious lines, we knew this was true, but someone finally proved it - There are Baptists with brains. (Sorry for anyone who might be offended, but alliterative jokes are often too good to pass up.) Read and see whether or not this minister might just have the right idea. (The post is in
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Turning politically, we note with dismay and a little twitchiness that perhaps the prosecution alters the evidence to earn their conviction, rather than letting the innocent away. This seems to be a worldwide thing - the Space Hijackers site often has the Police around, even when they aren't doing anything that affects anyone but the spectators. So what to do about it? Well, I do believe a very long time ago I wrote about a gentleman from Canada who has cameras in his eyeglasses, takes video cameras into stores, and generally tries to make people aware of the surveillance going on in stores. Or I at least watched a program about someone of this nature. It might not be the same guy who's in this article about keeping surveillance on the people keeping surveillance (although I think it is the same person), but the idea is stellar. If everybody's filming everybody else, then there's good reason for everybody to either behave perfectly or to want to escape from the cameras - I suspect the latter more than the former, and thus it could provide some impetus to stop mistrusting everybody else so much. Who knows?
Next-to-last, I'll probably be in the mass of people trying to get Piro to sign for them tomorrow, so if you're headed that way, let me know - maybe we can all meet somewhere and then go plunge into the crowd.
Lastly, a new set of answers to the interview meme - my answers by
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
1) Probably Japan, if moving there also counts that I'll be able to learn the language. I've heard it's a beautiful place, and there's a lot there that I'm interested in seeing.
2) Yep. Although I think I might have a system fairly well worked out, it continues to be tweaked.
3) Of course.
4) Go for it! IF there are other intelligent races out there, it would be better to know about them before they come knocking on our door. There's a risk involved of inviting the Borg back to the home planet, sure, but it should be one we're willing to take.
5) Not unimaginative, but somehow, coming up with five good questions is a strain.
The questions:
1) If you could move anywhere, where would it be?
2) Do you believe in magic?
3) Intentionally left blank?
4) Space exploration: your opinion.
5) does everyone have so much trouble thinking up five questions, despite having so many ideas of what to ask before being asked for the questions, or am I just unimaginative?