International stuff to start - charges have finally been leveled against Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, a prisoner at Guantanamo since 2006, for his part in the USS Cole bombing in 2000. The government has said it will seek the death penalty. I think I’m going to be perpetually curious about the long delay between terror incidents happening and charges finally appearing. I’m hoping that’s because the methodological gathering of evidence and building of a case simply took this long to produce something that the government believes will stick, rather than flailing about looking for someone to charge. The defendant says he only confessed because he was being waterboarded and tortured. The government confirms that some waterboarding took place. Which makes this case that much tougher, because anything said even potentially under duress should be inadmissible.
Ahmadinejad is now apparently the target of sophisticated assassination plots using X-ray machines, according to Iran’s ambassador to Italy. So now we’re seeing more covert ops and more claims of covert ops. How long is this dance going to continue before one side blinks and loses?
Oil infighting in Iraq's parliament means contracts with major oil companies for consultancy are missing their deadlines. Iraqis have gotten smart and decided they want to have contracts that benefit them, not the companies that are looking to exploit them. I foresee a longer process in trying to negotiate something much fairer to the Iraqi populace.
Domestic and candidate matters both to start the inside-the-nation roundup. Namely, in a place that prides itself for the mass number of patriotic symbols it can bring to bear, falsehoods about Senator Obama's religion still find fertile ground. Mostly because people are more willing to believe what other people, their friends, have said about the candidate rather than doing the research for themselves and finding out what the truth is. It’s sad, but it’s probably something to do with how we live - after all, an entire town can’t be stupid enough to believe the full slate of rumors, can they? Not only that, but as Liberal Eagle notes, a "devoted family man" in this town threatened to disown his daughter if she voted for Obama, because he believes the "secret Muslim" lie. If the country does as this town does, then Obama’s sunk and the Republican rumor machine wins again. How many people in November will go to the polls still believing that Senator Obama is not a Christian? Oy. Mind-boggling.
Speaking of symbols, the World Trade Center rebuild is taking much longer than expected, due to design difficulties and aggressive timetables on reconstruction. So those waiting for Freedom Tower will have to wait a while longer.
The Associated Press is planning on meeting a group that claims to represent bloggers everywhere about how to handle and quote AP articles on-line. The AP seeks to create guidelines for use which may or may not permit others to use AP stories in a manner consistent with fair use provisions. The AP cited a want to not be taken out of context or have its news diluted by being spread across the Internet at large. I also find it interesting that someone is claiming to represent bloggers either nationwide or worldwide. We’re kind of more like Anonymous than any one group.
CNS throws more numbers at us - their headline is people blame the government for high gas prices, when the case is that they also blame oil companies, both foreign and domestic, have changed their driving habits, are considering better fuel mileage vehicles, and support both greening things up and drilling domestically for oil. That’s not blaming the government, that’s lashing out at anybody they can hit, as well as seriously considering any method that will work to relieve the price pressure. I suspect the more accurate headline would read “Americans pissed off at high fuel prices, want quick solutions”.
Another possible result of abstinence-based education - a 14 year-old girl gave birth to a child, then tried to flush it down the toilet, killing the child. Underage pregnancy, only one way out seen, any access to abortions? So instead, live birth, then death. That said, guess what’s coming forward onto our televisions tonight? The Secret Life of the American Teenager swings the biggest "sex makes you miserable, through pregnancy or disease or finding out that your first time wasn't stellar" hammer it can find. Mostly the pregnancy and disease parts, though.
Other items of interest to the Unabashed Feminism Department include a receptionist fired for refusing to get coffee for the bosses, apparently after she objected that females getting coffee for male bosses reinforced gender stereotypes. I think she has a point, and despite the sexual harassment suit failing, maybe we can finally make it so that either everyone has to get coffee at some point or everyone gets coffee themselves. Oh, and speaking thereof, Starbucks is closing 600 stores in the U.S. Apparently, the all blocks covered technique doesn’t really work as well as we thought.
Into the opinion columns - Thomas Sowell wants the populace to consider judicial appointments in their vote for President. Considering the current administration has several scandals relating to politics-based apponitments, Mr. Sowell is spot-on. Where Mr. Sowell and I disagree, though, is in his casual dismissal of third-party candidates by this logic. The assumption that the one of the major party candidates will win the election is a challengable one. I don’t expect it to happen any time soon, because plenty of people believe the lie that there are only two parties. Kang and Kodos would be proud. I do like the incentive to vote for a candidate because he has the power to appoint to the Supreme Court and federal courts. I just still believe that people should vote for the candidate that best reflects their views, regardless of whether they can “win” or not, because if everyone voted their preference, then some of those candidates just might win. We’d need a system like ranked choice voting, though, if that were to ever happen. The third most popular candidate might still win, and might still be a major party candidate, but it would give us a much clearer picture of where the populace’s loyalties really lie, including how many Ron Paul supporters there really are.
In any case, voting to prevent decisions that permitted local governments to use eminent domain and give the resulting seizure to other private entities sounds like a good use of one’s civic duty.
Continuing in candidate matters, the exaggeration of Gen. Clark’s comments yesterday looks like it might be part of a larger narrative, as it looks like Senator McCain's military service and POW experience is a perfect place for both sides to take umbrage and snipe, despite said service only being relevant in determining what the Senator’s outlook on striking at other countries might be like. We have some idea of how the Senator will continue international relations. I suppose it makes sense, though, that if Senator McCain wants to play himself up as qualified because he’s been a pilot and a POW many years before, then others will come looking for ways to take the wind out of those sails and try to keep the populace focused on issues, rather than perceived character.
Flipping over to the other major candidate, Senator Obama intends to expand faith-based programming, but to prevent faith-based programs that use taxpayer dollars from hiring and firing based on religion, co-opting a sstem already in place and trying to bring it into compliance with all the requirements the federal government has to abide by. If he pulls it off, and it is made properly welcome and encouraging to non-Christian groups, it could be quite the Obaam coup. If it continues to be mired in the religious politics that give preference to one type of religion over another, as in the current administration, then this decision is not particularly wise. We’ll see how things turn out, if we have a President Obama. Ariana Huffington agrees that tacking to the center is a bad move for Obama, because it alienates his base and makes him look waffly and not change-based. David Limbaugh suggests that the Democratic Party will be purged of its conservatives if the left elect Obama, and that all of the Senator's campaign promises will have the opposite effect, in essence, still believing that Obama is still completely a leftist candidate, despite his current more centrist rhetoric. I don’t know. Might be interesting to see conservatives scared of the Democratic Party, and an actual bunch of liberals in charge and trying to make policy. It would certainly be a refreshing change compared to the last eight years.
Paul Weyrich believes liberals have control of the media, except for talk radio, and intend on reinstituting the Fairness Doctrine through secret means. If liberals really do control the media, why would they want the Fairness Doctrine to return? It would force them to give up their time to conservative viewpoints, even if they did get time on talk radio bands and stations. The majority secret cabal would not want to give up their own bases just to get access to someone else’s. I don’t buy it. With consolidation and a select few companies owning quite a few radio stations across the dial and the country, if Weyrich really believes in the shadowy media conspiracy, he’d do better to try and get Clear Channel broken up under antitrust laws than to spend his time chasing after phantasms in the legislation.
Ed Feulner wonders why the populace is pessimistic, considering all the progress in Iraq and sound economy and the ability of the American people to overcome problems. Well, everything’s good excepting for those pesky entitlements, but we can work those out, too, he says. Don’t worry, be happy, and so forth. Doug Wilson wants the populace to think long-term about ending oil dependence, through linking short-term drilling ability with research and development of long-term oil-weaning tech. The further along we get toward stopping our oil dependence, the more the oil companies will be able to feed the short-term needs before we gloriously convert over to our cleaner and better power and fuels. While the domestic drilling part I’m ambivalent about, incentivizing oil companies to research their next best thing is very much something we should be doing.
In science and technology, the severely disabled may soon be able to use a tongue-based system for computer operation or for driving a wheelchair. Body-computer interfaces get cooler and cooler by the day. Soon enough, I suspect, we’ll have them for augmentation rather than trying to get the disabled back to full functioning.
After having her car battery die, a woman needed assistance to figure out how to manually unlock her door. Normally, when we have technology malfunctions, we expect big consequences, like leaks of PINs from ATMs to computers that permit hackers to obtain the numbers and then use them. Someone not knowing there was a manual way of engaging locks is anticlimactic.
There’s also Fish School, a system for training your fish to do tricks. *shrug* I’m more interested, I suspect, in Fish Fight.
Last out of this section, however, is pure, unpolluted pwnage of Andrew Schlafly, the founder of Conservapedia. Recall, for a bit, the grand experiment conducted by Dr. Lenski with E. Coli that eventaully produced a mutant variant of the bacterium that could thrive in an environment previously hostile to them. Sure, it took tens of thousands of generations (about 20 years, Hume time, from start to finish), but after obtaining such bacterium, it looked like the mechanics of evolution were validated. So, naturally, accusations and insistences that the data was forged or somehow wrong, or that the experiment proved intelligent design rolled in. Conservapedia’s Schlafly demanded all the data. When it was pointed out that the important data was in the paper, Schlafly demanded the data again. Dr. Lenski then penned a significcantly less polite response, detailing that the data needed was in the paper, making a quick sketch of the scientific method, and ending by saying that he would be glad to let a competent scientist try to repeat the experiment or derive further conclusions from it, which excluded Schlafly and many of his minions.
Next-to-last for tonight, God speaks, and has some choice words for his followers.
Last for tonight, though, finding something we should already know - everyone, including sex workers, enjoys a good cuddle. In a state where it’s legal to do such things, a gent paid $100 to cuddle. It was going to start as a short session, even after it took some convincing that cuddles was all he wanted. And despite the things tarting as sort of a one-off joke, both participants found they enjoyed the cuddles, turning a short session and some banter into a longer session with some deeper dialogue. Everyone could use a cuddle or two. It’s sad that we don’t have enough people in our lives to provide them.
Ahmadinejad is now apparently the target of sophisticated assassination plots using X-ray machines, according to Iran’s ambassador to Italy. So now we’re seeing more covert ops and more claims of covert ops. How long is this dance going to continue before one side blinks and loses?
Oil infighting in Iraq's parliament means contracts with major oil companies for consultancy are missing their deadlines. Iraqis have gotten smart and decided they want to have contracts that benefit them, not the companies that are looking to exploit them. I foresee a longer process in trying to negotiate something much fairer to the Iraqi populace.
Domestic and candidate matters both to start the inside-the-nation roundup. Namely, in a place that prides itself for the mass number of patriotic symbols it can bring to bear, falsehoods about Senator Obama's religion still find fertile ground. Mostly because people are more willing to believe what other people, their friends, have said about the candidate rather than doing the research for themselves and finding out what the truth is. It’s sad, but it’s probably something to do with how we live - after all, an entire town can’t be stupid enough to believe the full slate of rumors, can they? Not only that, but as Liberal Eagle notes, a "devoted family man" in this town threatened to disown his daughter if she voted for Obama, because he believes the "secret Muslim" lie. If the country does as this town does, then Obama’s sunk and the Republican rumor machine wins again. How many people in November will go to the polls still believing that Senator Obama is not a Christian? Oy. Mind-boggling.
Speaking of symbols, the World Trade Center rebuild is taking much longer than expected, due to design difficulties and aggressive timetables on reconstruction. So those waiting for Freedom Tower will have to wait a while longer.
The Associated Press is planning on meeting a group that claims to represent bloggers everywhere about how to handle and quote AP articles on-line. The AP seeks to create guidelines for use which may or may not permit others to use AP stories in a manner consistent with fair use provisions. The AP cited a want to not be taken out of context or have its news diluted by being spread across the Internet at large. I also find it interesting that someone is claiming to represent bloggers either nationwide or worldwide. We’re kind of more like Anonymous than any one group.
CNS throws more numbers at us - their headline is people blame the government for high gas prices, when the case is that they also blame oil companies, both foreign and domestic, have changed their driving habits, are considering better fuel mileage vehicles, and support both greening things up and drilling domestically for oil. That’s not blaming the government, that’s lashing out at anybody they can hit, as well as seriously considering any method that will work to relieve the price pressure. I suspect the more accurate headline would read “Americans pissed off at high fuel prices, want quick solutions”.
Another possible result of abstinence-based education - a 14 year-old girl gave birth to a child, then tried to flush it down the toilet, killing the child. Underage pregnancy, only one way out seen, any access to abortions? So instead, live birth, then death. That said, guess what’s coming forward onto our televisions tonight? The Secret Life of the American Teenager swings the biggest "sex makes you miserable, through pregnancy or disease or finding out that your first time wasn't stellar" hammer it can find. Mostly the pregnancy and disease parts, though.
Other items of interest to the Unabashed Feminism Department include a receptionist fired for refusing to get coffee for the bosses, apparently after she objected that females getting coffee for male bosses reinforced gender stereotypes. I think she has a point, and despite the sexual harassment suit failing, maybe we can finally make it so that either everyone has to get coffee at some point or everyone gets coffee themselves. Oh, and speaking thereof, Starbucks is closing 600 stores in the U.S. Apparently, the all blocks covered technique doesn’t really work as well as we thought.
Into the opinion columns - Thomas Sowell wants the populace to consider judicial appointments in their vote for President. Considering the current administration has several scandals relating to politics-based apponitments, Mr. Sowell is spot-on. Where Mr. Sowell and I disagree, though, is in his casual dismissal of third-party candidates by this logic. The assumption that the one of the major party candidates will win the election is a challengable one. I don’t expect it to happen any time soon, because plenty of people believe the lie that there are only two parties. Kang and Kodos would be proud. I do like the incentive to vote for a candidate because he has the power to appoint to the Supreme Court and federal courts. I just still believe that people should vote for the candidate that best reflects their views, regardless of whether they can “win” or not, because if everyone voted their preference, then some of those candidates just might win. We’d need a system like ranked choice voting, though, if that were to ever happen. The third most popular candidate might still win, and might still be a major party candidate, but it would give us a much clearer picture of where the populace’s loyalties really lie, including how many Ron Paul supporters there really are.
In any case, voting to prevent decisions that permitted local governments to use eminent domain and give the resulting seizure to other private entities sounds like a good use of one’s civic duty.
Continuing in candidate matters, the exaggeration of Gen. Clark’s comments yesterday looks like it might be part of a larger narrative, as it looks like Senator McCain's military service and POW experience is a perfect place for both sides to take umbrage and snipe, despite said service only being relevant in determining what the Senator’s outlook on striking at other countries might be like. We have some idea of how the Senator will continue international relations. I suppose it makes sense, though, that if Senator McCain wants to play himself up as qualified because he’s been a pilot and a POW many years before, then others will come looking for ways to take the wind out of those sails and try to keep the populace focused on issues, rather than perceived character.
Flipping over to the other major candidate, Senator Obama intends to expand faith-based programming, but to prevent faith-based programs that use taxpayer dollars from hiring and firing based on religion, co-opting a sstem already in place and trying to bring it into compliance with all the requirements the federal government has to abide by. If he pulls it off, and it is made properly welcome and encouraging to non-Christian groups, it could be quite the Obaam coup. If it continues to be mired in the religious politics that give preference to one type of religion over another, as in the current administration, then this decision is not particularly wise. We’ll see how things turn out, if we have a President Obama. Ariana Huffington agrees that tacking to the center is a bad move for Obama, because it alienates his base and makes him look waffly and not change-based. David Limbaugh suggests that the Democratic Party will be purged of its conservatives if the left elect Obama, and that all of the Senator's campaign promises will have the opposite effect, in essence, still believing that Obama is still completely a leftist candidate, despite his current more centrist rhetoric. I don’t know. Might be interesting to see conservatives scared of the Democratic Party, and an actual bunch of liberals in charge and trying to make policy. It would certainly be a refreshing change compared to the last eight years.
Paul Weyrich believes liberals have control of the media, except for talk radio, and intend on reinstituting the Fairness Doctrine through secret means. If liberals really do control the media, why would they want the Fairness Doctrine to return? It would force them to give up their time to conservative viewpoints, even if they did get time on talk radio bands and stations. The majority secret cabal would not want to give up their own bases just to get access to someone else’s. I don’t buy it. With consolidation and a select few companies owning quite a few radio stations across the dial and the country, if Weyrich really believes in the shadowy media conspiracy, he’d do better to try and get Clear Channel broken up under antitrust laws than to spend his time chasing after phantasms in the legislation.
Ed Feulner wonders why the populace is pessimistic, considering all the progress in Iraq and sound economy and the ability of the American people to overcome problems. Well, everything’s good excepting for those pesky entitlements, but we can work those out, too, he says. Don’t worry, be happy, and so forth. Doug Wilson wants the populace to think long-term about ending oil dependence, through linking short-term drilling ability with research and development of long-term oil-weaning tech. The further along we get toward stopping our oil dependence, the more the oil companies will be able to feed the short-term needs before we gloriously convert over to our cleaner and better power and fuels. While the domestic drilling part I’m ambivalent about, incentivizing oil companies to research their next best thing is very much something we should be doing.
In science and technology, the severely disabled may soon be able to use a tongue-based system for computer operation or for driving a wheelchair. Body-computer interfaces get cooler and cooler by the day. Soon enough, I suspect, we’ll have them for augmentation rather than trying to get the disabled back to full functioning.
After having her car battery die, a woman needed assistance to figure out how to manually unlock her door. Normally, when we have technology malfunctions, we expect big consequences, like leaks of PINs from ATMs to computers that permit hackers to obtain the numbers and then use them. Someone not knowing there was a manual way of engaging locks is anticlimactic.
There’s also Fish School, a system for training your fish to do tricks. *shrug* I’m more interested, I suspect, in Fish Fight.
Last out of this section, however, is pure, unpolluted pwnage of Andrew Schlafly, the founder of Conservapedia. Recall, for a bit, the grand experiment conducted by Dr. Lenski with E. Coli that eventaully produced a mutant variant of the bacterium that could thrive in an environment previously hostile to them. Sure, it took tens of thousands of generations (about 20 years, Hume time, from start to finish), but after obtaining such bacterium, it looked like the mechanics of evolution were validated. So, naturally, accusations and insistences that the data was forged or somehow wrong, or that the experiment proved intelligent design rolled in. Conservapedia’s Schlafly demanded all the data. When it was pointed out that the important data was in the paper, Schlafly demanded the data again. Dr. Lenski then penned a significcantly less polite response, detailing that the data needed was in the paper, making a quick sketch of the scientific method, and ending by saying that he would be glad to let a competent scientist try to repeat the experiment or derive further conclusions from it, which excluded Schlafly and many of his minions.
Next-to-last for tonight, God speaks, and has some choice words for his followers.
Last for tonight, though, finding something we should already know - everyone, including sex workers, enjoys a good cuddle. In a state where it’s legal to do such things, a gent paid $100 to cuddle. It was going to start as a short session, even after it took some convincing that cuddles was all he wanted. And despite the things tarting as sort of a one-off joke, both participants found they enjoyed the cuddles, turning a short session and some banter into a longer session with some deeper dialogue. Everyone could use a cuddle or two. It’s sad that we don’t have enough people in our lives to provide them.