Dispatches From A Public Librarian - quite possibly a real story, because in this profession, 90% of the time when we say something, it’s because it happened, not because we’re exaggerating.
Internationally, as a move most likely aimed at consolidating the gains Russia has made from Georgia, Russia has placed mobile short-range missile launchers in South Ossetia, sparking cries that such a move is against the cease-fire agreement.
Domestically, an appeals court has ruled that members of the government, acting in their official capacities, cannot be sued in civil court individually. In dismissing a civil claim in the Valerie Plame case, the appeals court made it clear that “government employees who engage in questionable acts, such as abusing prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay facility or engaging in defamatory speech, cannot be held individually liable if they are carrying out official duties”, according to the article. So either the government permits itself to be sued for actinos that it doesn’t consider to be wrong, or no relief is forthcoming. The Winter Patriot takes it a step further and says the appellate court has said that it's okay to commit any sort of crime while acting in a government capacity and the people cannot hold someone accountable. It at least used to require a presidential pardon after leaving office before the courts could not prosecute someone for their actions while in office. Some part of my brain is tickling me that says this is an extension of the immunity the government currently enjoys from prosecution or civil suit, when it wants to be immune. Is this new precedent, or more of the same?
An article about how even people with advanced degrees and semistable jobs can find themselves at the soup kitchen, thanks to divorce and having children from Heather Ryan at Salon. The piece is equal parts “the difficulty of admitting to oneself that the soup kitchen is a necessary decision, and getting over the sense of shame and failure that going to a soup kitchen or a food bank often is for people who are employed and degreed” and “the complexity of the system and how going to the food bank and soup kitchen reduces one’s want to believe in the political system, because it is obviously failing a lot of people”. What brought the article to our attention, from Jezebel, is the comment section, where pit vipers came out, accusing the writer of being stupid, lacking planning, and otherwise creating the situation she found herself in all by herself, because Heather got her MFA and was a writer, until the problematic situation put her in secretarial work to get a regular paycheck.
The conventions are just around the corner, where the presumptive nominees become the official nominees. Senator Obama is willing to let Senator Clinton's supporters have a roll-call vote at the convention, so they can register that support before confirming Senator Obama. The buzz is, of course, that such an opportunity will result in the Clinton supporters stirring up sparks and trouble for Senator Obama, making the convention less smooth and more fractious.
In the opinion columns, Rich Tucker thinks that the United States and Europe should rearm and return to utilizing the power of tanks and troops to control Russia, otherwise Russia won’t respect them and will do whatever it wants to do.
The WSJ thinks that nationalism during the Olympic Games is a good thing, based on the way Kobe Bryant has been waving the country’s flag at other sport events and speaking of the USA as the greatest country in the world. If there wasn’t some nationalism and national pride, then the competition wouldn’t be quite as fierce. What the WSJ is missing out on, though, is that the Games are conducted, theoretically, in a peaceful atmosphere, where competitors strive fairly, meet members of other countries, hopefully get some international expsure, and come home better for having the experience, medals or no medals. Having national pride is good - being able to shelve it off the court so as to learn and enjoy the international flavor of the Games is important, too.
The Slacktivist is happy to see the current administration thinking like criminals again who will break the law and try to lie about it, which is an improvement over an administration that casually dismisses the law as unimportant. It’s not an improvement to, say, a government that actually functions within the rule of law, but it is ”better“.
On candidate opinions, Jack Cafferty thinks that John McCain has as much intellectual depth as the current administrator, making him even more of McSame to many.
On the other side, the WSJ thinks Barack Obama's reasons why he wouldn't appoint Clarence Thomas aren't any good, comparing Justice Thomas’s career judicial record to Senator Obama's senatorial record. Apples-to-oranges, anyone? And the implication that Senator Obama is too young and too inexperienced to say anything about whether Justice Thomas is competent sounds a lot like the arrogance the Senator’s opponents accuse him of.
Floys and Mary Beth Brown think every African-American will vote for Senator Obama, and thus try to inject doubts about the Senator by quoting a conservative relative of Dr. Martin Luther King. The quotes center around how Senator Obama’s pro-choice stance is a betrayal of Dr. King’s dream, but include his other liberal positions as further evidence of the need to see how opposed to Dr. King the senator is. I can applaud the idea of ensuring a candidate actually is in line with your politics, rather than voting for him blindly on the basis of his party affiliation, race, or religious belief, but anyone claiming that Senator Obama’s heritage is Muslim, not African-American, takes a credibility hit for ridiculous and untrue statements.
Drawing on his own research as support, Scott Thumma says that most megachurches aren't the political dynamos we see on TV. Like most churches aren’t super-political. Considering, however, that we’ve had the era of Robertson and Falwell, Hagee and Wright, and that we’re having presidential candidates speak in giant churches, even if it’s a small amount of megachurches that do all this, the influence they can wield was or is considerable. Nationally-televised evangelicals reach lots of people more than fill their church.
Paul Jacob wants to go meet Sal Grosso, a citizen who started with some discrepancies in the tracking of water and ended up with a full-scale municipal corruption audit, because he documented things well and kept taking it up the ladder until he found someone who would do the investigation.
The Cranking Widgets blog has a post from Dave Crenshaw about the myth of multitasking - what we're really doing is switchtasking, and every time we switch, there’s a cost associated with it.
Our science, techonology, and art departments has gotten around to algae pools being fed extra carbon dioxide to generate more biofuel while taking care of excess waste CO2, opinions about whether to use the bands in between television channels for broadband internet access, arsenic as a carrier of energy during photosynthesis, the skeletons of cartoon characters and more progress in generating lifelike CGI actors.
Next to last, our art department has quite a few useful things. The steampunk style of Jennifer Rodgers, a gallery of 50s and 60s homosexual fiction covers, and Disney Princesses as the women of Sin City.
Singled out for further study, though, it looks like the Burger King folks are either getting edgier or are lettign thigns that push the bounds of good taste through. Exhibit A is the Veg City Airport advert, where an onion is being strip-searched in the view of other vegetables at the airport, with his possessions spread out on the ground for all to see as well. Exhibits B-E, the Veg City Red Light District, a Veg City Sniper attack, Veg City New Year's, and Veg City Halloween. Definitely different advertisements, and lots of potentially disturbing stuff for those who look closely. At least it’s not being sued for giving someone a tapeworm.
Last for tonight, the Hapiness Project has a happy story - excellent service rewarded because with the CEO overheard the thanks.
Internationally, as a move most likely aimed at consolidating the gains Russia has made from Georgia, Russia has placed mobile short-range missile launchers in South Ossetia, sparking cries that such a move is against the cease-fire agreement.
Domestically, an appeals court has ruled that members of the government, acting in their official capacities, cannot be sued in civil court individually. In dismissing a civil claim in the Valerie Plame case, the appeals court made it clear that “government employees who engage in questionable acts, such as abusing prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay facility or engaging in defamatory speech, cannot be held individually liable if they are carrying out official duties”, according to the article. So either the government permits itself to be sued for actinos that it doesn’t consider to be wrong, or no relief is forthcoming. The Winter Patriot takes it a step further and says the appellate court has said that it's okay to commit any sort of crime while acting in a government capacity and the people cannot hold someone accountable. It at least used to require a presidential pardon after leaving office before the courts could not prosecute someone for their actions while in office. Some part of my brain is tickling me that says this is an extension of the immunity the government currently enjoys from prosecution or civil suit, when it wants to be immune. Is this new precedent, or more of the same?
An article about how even people with advanced degrees and semistable jobs can find themselves at the soup kitchen, thanks to divorce and having children from Heather Ryan at Salon. The piece is equal parts “the difficulty of admitting to oneself that the soup kitchen is a necessary decision, and getting over the sense of shame and failure that going to a soup kitchen or a food bank often is for people who are employed and degreed” and “the complexity of the system and how going to the food bank and soup kitchen reduces one’s want to believe in the political system, because it is obviously failing a lot of people”. What brought the article to our attention, from Jezebel, is the comment section, where pit vipers came out, accusing the writer of being stupid, lacking planning, and otherwise creating the situation she found herself in all by herself, because Heather got her MFA and was a writer, until the problematic situation put her in secretarial work to get a regular paycheck.
The conventions are just around the corner, where the presumptive nominees become the official nominees. Senator Obama is willing to let Senator Clinton's supporters have a roll-call vote at the convention, so they can register that support before confirming Senator Obama. The buzz is, of course, that such an opportunity will result in the Clinton supporters stirring up sparks and trouble for Senator Obama, making the convention less smooth and more fractious.
In the opinion columns, Rich Tucker thinks that the United States and Europe should rearm and return to utilizing the power of tanks and troops to control Russia, otherwise Russia won’t respect them and will do whatever it wants to do.
The WSJ thinks that nationalism during the Olympic Games is a good thing, based on the way Kobe Bryant has been waving the country’s flag at other sport events and speaking of the USA as the greatest country in the world. If there wasn’t some nationalism and national pride, then the competition wouldn’t be quite as fierce. What the WSJ is missing out on, though, is that the Games are conducted, theoretically, in a peaceful atmosphere, where competitors strive fairly, meet members of other countries, hopefully get some international expsure, and come home better for having the experience, medals or no medals. Having national pride is good - being able to shelve it off the court so as to learn and enjoy the international flavor of the Games is important, too.
The Slacktivist is happy to see the current administration thinking like criminals again who will break the law and try to lie about it, which is an improvement over an administration that casually dismisses the law as unimportant. It’s not an improvement to, say, a government that actually functions within the rule of law, but it is ”better“.
On candidate opinions, Jack Cafferty thinks that John McCain has as much intellectual depth as the current administrator, making him even more of McSame to many.
On the other side, the WSJ thinks Barack Obama's reasons why he wouldn't appoint Clarence Thomas aren't any good, comparing Justice Thomas’s career judicial record to Senator Obama's senatorial record. Apples-to-oranges, anyone? And the implication that Senator Obama is too young and too inexperienced to say anything about whether Justice Thomas is competent sounds a lot like the arrogance the Senator’s opponents accuse him of.
Floys and Mary Beth Brown think every African-American will vote for Senator Obama, and thus try to inject doubts about the Senator by quoting a conservative relative of Dr. Martin Luther King. The quotes center around how Senator Obama’s pro-choice stance is a betrayal of Dr. King’s dream, but include his other liberal positions as further evidence of the need to see how opposed to Dr. King the senator is. I can applaud the idea of ensuring a candidate actually is in line with your politics, rather than voting for him blindly on the basis of his party affiliation, race, or religious belief, but anyone claiming that Senator Obama’s heritage is Muslim, not African-American, takes a credibility hit for ridiculous and untrue statements.
Drawing on his own research as support, Scott Thumma says that most megachurches aren't the political dynamos we see on TV. Like most churches aren’t super-political. Considering, however, that we’ve had the era of Robertson and Falwell, Hagee and Wright, and that we’re having presidential candidates speak in giant churches, even if it’s a small amount of megachurches that do all this, the influence they can wield was or is considerable. Nationally-televised evangelicals reach lots of people more than fill their church.
Paul Jacob wants to go meet Sal Grosso, a citizen who started with some discrepancies in the tracking of water and ended up with a full-scale municipal corruption audit, because he documented things well and kept taking it up the ladder until he found someone who would do the investigation.
The Cranking Widgets blog has a post from Dave Crenshaw about the myth of multitasking - what we're really doing is switchtasking, and every time we switch, there’s a cost associated with it.
Our science, techonology, and art departments has gotten around to algae pools being fed extra carbon dioxide to generate more biofuel while taking care of excess waste CO2, opinions about whether to use the bands in between television channels for broadband internet access, arsenic as a carrier of energy during photosynthesis, the skeletons of cartoon characters and more progress in generating lifelike CGI actors.
Next to last, our art department has quite a few useful things. The steampunk style of Jennifer Rodgers, a gallery of 50s and 60s homosexual fiction covers, and Disney Princesses as the women of Sin City.
Singled out for further study, though, it looks like the Burger King folks are either getting edgier or are lettign thigns that push the bounds of good taste through. Exhibit A is the Veg City Airport advert, where an onion is being strip-searched in the view of other vegetables at the airport, with his possessions spread out on the ground for all to see as well. Exhibits B-E, the Veg City Red Light District, a Veg City Sniper attack, Veg City New Year's, and Veg City Halloween. Definitely different advertisements, and lots of potentially disturbing stuff for those who look closely. At least it’s not being sued for giving someone a tapeworm.
Last for tonight, the Hapiness Project has a happy story - excellent service rewarded because with the CEO overheard the thanks.