...wedding sparklers. That’s right, wedding sparklers. We have some strange people in this world. The Boy from Michigan also has to have his point, laugh, at 10 ways to deal with snow from the BBC, mostly because, well, snow is a Michigan thing. We deal. And I’m still glad a bought these boots the first year I moved, because that way I’m not stuck when there’s totally unexpected snowfall in the Seattle area. Should have bought the tire chains then, though.
And as if by design, more revelations about the drugs, homosexual sex, and bedroom proclivities of Ted Haggard appear. Including, apparently, that his wife knew about most of it. Which means that the General takes to the blog waves defending the practice of righteous rogering, and nervously contemplating whether Ted really had The Gay.
However, not even Ted Haggard’s drug-fueled orgies can top (no pun intended) this example of Great Weirdness - the "EX-masturbator" shirt, focal point of the EX- campaign. The situation here calls for an ellipsis. Who would wear such a thing proudly? Anyone betting there will be an “ex-gay” version, if there isn’t one already? Plus, as the General alludes to, why buy it if you might have to take it off every few days?
Yeah. It’s today’s news, coming right up, after this commercial where we throw miniature pies at insects.
Mr. Gates has moved from software bugs to organic ones, releasing mosquitoes on attendees at his TED talk. As someone who grew up with the damn things, that’s not really kosher, sir.
A look into a part of going blind where people start seeing things, because the brain craves processing information, so much so that it makes stuff up if the feed isn’t there, and the brain is expecting it to be. In a sense, the brain is addicted and has to have enough time to readjust to the new environment. If Bruce Alexander's theory that addiction is based on psychological and environmental problems instead of exposure to an addicting agent, then this brain thing makes sense... and we need to retool our addiction thearpy procedures so that we can get someone away from teh stressors that trigger the addictive response - might even mean that with proper help and retraining, people who are addicted to alcohol or other relatively safe things might even be able to enjoy them again without triggering the addiction. I’d give it higher success chances than having to go through a 12-step that makes you get religion and totally avoid the thing, no matter what situation its in. (The article also mentions that in our highly individualistic society, where people don’t peek out and make social bonds and webs and interact, we tend to be addicted to things more. So if we had good neighborhoods, maybe we could tone some of that down, too?)
At the international desk, Krygyzstan has said the United States is no longer welcome at their air bases, which may affect the campaign in Afghanistan. Naturally, the architect of the surge and counterinsurgency in Iraq is expected to work his mojo again in a totally different circumstance, with many hopes pinned on his continued success.
Keeping on the pressure and fear, a top general in Iraq still claims that Iran has ben funding and aiding the insurgency, claims Iran denies. This plays nicely into Richard Cheney's unrelenting fear campaign, this time with "terrorists will get us if President Obama closes down Guantanamo" message, even though he’s been out of the White House for two whole weeks now, and he’s not contributing anything that other conservative opinions haven’t already covered, and he’s still defending the policies that he helped to write and implement as if he were still Vice President. Which leaves me to wonder - if he gets subpoenaed, will he also claim “executive privilege”?
It’s apparently a slow news day, as there’s a pretty obvious item coming up, although it’s supposed to be shocking, I guess - the level of civility in political discourse has not improved any since the new administration took office, with about even amounts saying things have gotten worse and better, according to the poll. Until we stop paying people to be divisive, partisan, and obstructionist, or we manage to shift things so that both sides of the spectrum stop seeing their political beliefs with the same doctrinaire “I‘m right and you aren’t“ mindset as a lot of monotheists (and others) see their religious beliefs (those could use some loosening, too), I think we’re mired in uncivil discourse. If you're talking approval ratings, however, those seem to be on the rise.
The First Lady is taking on more of a political role faster than most commentators expected, according to Politico. They also seem to be amazed by the grace of her multi-tasking abilities, and wonder what sort of power she will be bringing to bear for the President. Might also really draw in the calls that the ”First Lady“ deserves a stipend for her political work. Not in this economy, though.
Landing in opinions and having a look around, Valtin points out that most rendition is extraordinary and outside the rule of law, the Army Field Manual has its own ghosts to exorcise, and that just because the new President said something, doesn't mean he'll actually do it the way we think he will. If we really wanted to be in compliance with the law, we wouldn’t do rendition at all, in addition to excising parts of the Army Field Manual that are definitely torture. A reminder that while moving away from the brazen flaunting of the law is an improvement, it would not do to simply let such things sink beneath the waves without real action.
On slightly less expansive matters, Mr. Williams continues to paint Social Security as a national Ponzi scheem destined for collapses or tax hikes, because the boom will be retiring and there aren’t enough people paying taxes in to cover the matter, not to mention all the raids on the Social Security trust by Congress. And, since nobody really has a right to the Social Security payments, if it declares itself insovlent and/or starts over again, tough noogies. I would hope, though, that nobody really expects to rely completely on Social Security for their retirement.
Mr. Stossel continues the economic opinions, claiming that there's no amount of spending that can get us out of the recession, because, of course, government spending takes away from private investment, the inherently superior option, and tax cuts, the other inherently superior option, because they both let the mob decide where to spend their money. (Spend? Heh. Not in this economy...), a sentiment that Mr. Turd Blossom agrees with, caling it a gambit that the populace accepts centralized, top-down government. Mr. Henninger thinks that spending on renovation and construction of new buildings for federal entities is autoeroticism, as Mr. Malkiel is alarmed by the large amount of protectionist sentiment in the stimulus bill. Mr. Gleaser is not fond of a Republican alternative that provides fixed-interest mortgages to the credit-worthy, also chanting the refrain of tax cuts.
The WSJ expresses confusion at the naming of the United States ambassador to Iraq, considering the new ambassador to be unqualified and of the wrong mindset for the job, as Mr. and Ms. Kagan marvel at the smoothness and results of the Iraq election. Mr. Weinthal suggests that Europe, and especially Germany, ditch oil and gas partnerships with Iran, to stop feeding their economy and giving them cash to develop nuclear weapons. Which does raise the question about where they will fill the void left by stopping contracts with Iran. Gazprom certainly is not the place to look, considering it and Ukraine are likely to have yearly fights and turnoffs.
Best opinion for the day, however, goes to Cliff Mason, who tells us just what the score is on class war - the proles are getting spanked, like always. Executive compensation limited to 500K? Symbolic slash. The real deal is that we can pass $700 billion for banks without blinking, even when the legislative and executive are at cross parties, but now that we have a unified set, we are having a tooth-and-nail fight over passing $800+ billion to help out the average person. Bail out the rich? No problem! Give needed and overdue improvements to the lives of the regular citizen? Socialism! Waste! Excess! Tax cuts are superior! (Unless, y’know, you want people to do more than recapitalize the banks by saving all that money that’s been tax-cut to them.)
In technology and science, have a look at the bones on this giant snake, knowledge that the a human cell contains a strong electric field internally, if one is buying, what material is most environmentally healthy, robots with neural networks that can evolve new methods of using appendages optimally when new appendages are added, Intel looking into System on a Chip designs, looking at brain wiring that gets us to work well with herd mentality, with the knowledge that being able to control people in groups can be used for good or bad. Additionally, more justification for "If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him" based on brain chemistry and evolutionary successful means, like being able to imagine, our need for cause and effect, and other such components.
Finally, the supposed $10 laptop turns out to be more hype than product. Soemthing is coming out, but it’s not a $10 laptop.
Last for tonight, The Visual Telling of Stories, where there are all sorts of images around, to see how the picture is worth one thousand words, compared with Mirroshards, which does short stories and flitterfics, all showing how few words it takes to create a lovely picture.
And as if by design, more revelations about the drugs, homosexual sex, and bedroom proclivities of Ted Haggard appear. Including, apparently, that his wife knew about most of it. Which means that the General takes to the blog waves defending the practice of righteous rogering, and nervously contemplating whether Ted really had The Gay.
However, not even Ted Haggard’s drug-fueled orgies can top (no pun intended) this example of Great Weirdness - the "EX-masturbator" shirt, focal point of the EX- campaign. The situation here calls for an ellipsis. Who would wear such a thing proudly? Anyone betting there will be an “ex-gay” version, if there isn’t one already? Plus, as the General alludes to, why buy it if you might have to take it off every few days?
Yeah. It’s today’s news, coming right up, after this commercial where we throw miniature pies at insects.
Mr. Gates has moved from software bugs to organic ones, releasing mosquitoes on attendees at his TED talk. As someone who grew up with the damn things, that’s not really kosher, sir.
A look into a part of going blind where people start seeing things, because the brain craves processing information, so much so that it makes stuff up if the feed isn’t there, and the brain is expecting it to be. In a sense, the brain is addicted and has to have enough time to readjust to the new environment. If Bruce Alexander's theory that addiction is based on psychological and environmental problems instead of exposure to an addicting agent, then this brain thing makes sense... and we need to retool our addiction thearpy procedures so that we can get someone away from teh stressors that trigger the addictive response - might even mean that with proper help and retraining, people who are addicted to alcohol or other relatively safe things might even be able to enjoy them again without triggering the addiction. I’d give it higher success chances than having to go through a 12-step that makes you get religion and totally avoid the thing, no matter what situation its in. (The article also mentions that in our highly individualistic society, where people don’t peek out and make social bonds and webs and interact, we tend to be addicted to things more. So if we had good neighborhoods, maybe we could tone some of that down, too?)
At the international desk, Krygyzstan has said the United States is no longer welcome at their air bases, which may affect the campaign in Afghanistan. Naturally, the architect of the surge and counterinsurgency in Iraq is expected to work his mojo again in a totally different circumstance, with many hopes pinned on his continued success.
Keeping on the pressure and fear, a top general in Iraq still claims that Iran has ben funding and aiding the insurgency, claims Iran denies. This plays nicely into Richard Cheney's unrelenting fear campaign, this time with "terrorists will get us if President Obama closes down Guantanamo" message, even though he’s been out of the White House for two whole weeks now, and he’s not contributing anything that other conservative opinions haven’t already covered, and he’s still defending the policies that he helped to write and implement as if he were still Vice President. Which leaves me to wonder - if he gets subpoenaed, will he also claim “executive privilege”?
It’s apparently a slow news day, as there’s a pretty obvious item coming up, although it’s supposed to be shocking, I guess - the level of civility in political discourse has not improved any since the new administration took office, with about even amounts saying things have gotten worse and better, according to the poll. Until we stop paying people to be divisive, partisan, and obstructionist, or we manage to shift things so that both sides of the spectrum stop seeing their political beliefs with the same doctrinaire “I‘m right and you aren’t“ mindset as a lot of monotheists (and others) see their religious beliefs (those could use some loosening, too), I think we’re mired in uncivil discourse. If you're talking approval ratings, however, those seem to be on the rise.
The First Lady is taking on more of a political role faster than most commentators expected, according to Politico. They also seem to be amazed by the grace of her multi-tasking abilities, and wonder what sort of power she will be bringing to bear for the President. Might also really draw in the calls that the ”First Lady“ deserves a stipend for her political work. Not in this economy, though.
Landing in opinions and having a look around, Valtin points out that most rendition is extraordinary and outside the rule of law, the Army Field Manual has its own ghosts to exorcise, and that just because the new President said something, doesn't mean he'll actually do it the way we think he will. If we really wanted to be in compliance with the law, we wouldn’t do rendition at all, in addition to excising parts of the Army Field Manual that are definitely torture. A reminder that while moving away from the brazen flaunting of the law is an improvement, it would not do to simply let such things sink beneath the waves without real action.
On slightly less expansive matters, Mr. Williams continues to paint Social Security as a national Ponzi scheem destined for collapses or tax hikes, because the boom will be retiring and there aren’t enough people paying taxes in to cover the matter, not to mention all the raids on the Social Security trust by Congress. And, since nobody really has a right to the Social Security payments, if it declares itself insovlent and/or starts over again, tough noogies. I would hope, though, that nobody really expects to rely completely on Social Security for their retirement.
Mr. Stossel continues the economic opinions, claiming that there's no amount of spending that can get us out of the recession, because, of course, government spending takes away from private investment, the inherently superior option, and tax cuts, the other inherently superior option, because they both let the mob decide where to spend their money. (Spend? Heh. Not in this economy...), a sentiment that Mr. Turd Blossom agrees with, caling it a gambit that the populace accepts centralized, top-down government. Mr. Henninger thinks that spending on renovation and construction of new buildings for federal entities is autoeroticism, as Mr. Malkiel is alarmed by the large amount of protectionist sentiment in the stimulus bill. Mr. Gleaser is not fond of a Republican alternative that provides fixed-interest mortgages to the credit-worthy, also chanting the refrain of tax cuts.
The WSJ expresses confusion at the naming of the United States ambassador to Iraq, considering the new ambassador to be unqualified and of the wrong mindset for the job, as Mr. and Ms. Kagan marvel at the smoothness and results of the Iraq election. Mr. Weinthal suggests that Europe, and especially Germany, ditch oil and gas partnerships with Iran, to stop feeding their economy and giving them cash to develop nuclear weapons. Which does raise the question about where they will fill the void left by stopping contracts with Iran. Gazprom certainly is not the place to look, considering it and Ukraine are likely to have yearly fights and turnoffs.
Best opinion for the day, however, goes to Cliff Mason, who tells us just what the score is on class war - the proles are getting spanked, like always. Executive compensation limited to 500K? Symbolic slash. The real deal is that we can pass $700 billion for banks without blinking, even when the legislative and executive are at cross parties, but now that we have a unified set, we are having a tooth-and-nail fight over passing $800+ billion to help out the average person. Bail out the rich? No problem! Give needed and overdue improvements to the lives of the regular citizen? Socialism! Waste! Excess! Tax cuts are superior! (Unless, y’know, you want people to do more than recapitalize the banks by saving all that money that’s been tax-cut to them.)
In technology and science, have a look at the bones on this giant snake, knowledge that the a human cell contains a strong electric field internally, if one is buying, what material is most environmentally healthy, robots with neural networks that can evolve new methods of using appendages optimally when new appendages are added, Intel looking into System on a Chip designs, looking at brain wiring that gets us to work well with herd mentality, with the knowledge that being able to control people in groups can be used for good or bad. Additionally, more justification for "If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him" based on brain chemistry and evolutionary successful means, like being able to imagine, our need for cause and effect, and other such components.
Finally, the supposed $10 laptop turns out to be more hype than product. Soemthing is coming out, but it’s not a $10 laptop.
Last for tonight, The Visual Telling of Stories, where there are all sorts of images around, to see how the picture is worth one thousand words, compared with Mirroshards, which does short stories and flitterfics, all showing how few words it takes to create a lovely picture.