Here we go again. Mrs. Barbara Bush had heart valve replacement surgery. Dalek parts found in a UK pond. And more, upcoming.
Starting up top and getting some part of the stupid out of the way with a doctor telling us that if you're smart, you're prone to more trouble dating. If you don’t want my word on it, read The Weirdo's take on it and understand it all in much less text. According to this doc, smart people apparently focus on other things instead of building relationships with people, which leads to feeling like those achievements should net them love, which turns us into Nice Guys (and Girls), who get in the way of our own potential success, and then knock out most of the dating pool as being insufficient for us. So, it’s all our own fault that we can’t find a date, or even a one-night stand, and our further failures only reinforce this until we’re bitter shells of Nice Guys. Um. Reality check, incoming. If, at some point, you get pegged as the Smart One, the Nerd, the Brain, the whatever, all throughout the hell that is primary education, your label dictates how many people will behave around you. It only takes so many mud baths, people edging away from you, being made fun of, generally sent to the outer rings of the popularity clique, and sycophants using you for your brains instead of actually trying for genuine interaction before you decide that the odds are going to be against you in finding someone worth dating. I think most of The Smart Ones recognize that all that wonderful brain talent means squat when it comes to relationships, but if nobody’s looks like they’d give them a chance to learn the ropes, then there’s no point in trying, is there?
Which makes that whole “exclude 95% of the population” bit pretty easy - you want to meet someone who sounds or feels like they’re genuinely interested in you and are willing to make the effort to get to know you (and have you get to know them) so that any changes to style and delivery that need to be made come from a place of understanding, rather than jumping straight into “Well, if you changed yourself into something more like the people you hated and excluded you, and didn’t give off such a smart person aloof air, you’d do better.” Which is what this advice is, make no mistake. Stop being such an egghead, smart person. Let go of the thing that’s brought you solace or praise and try to be like everyone else as much as you can. Be more jock-like aggressive, men. Be more tramp-like sexual, women. Is it any wonder that a lot of Nice Guys appear out of this sequence? After all, if you told most people that everything they had done to this point meant nothing or worse than nothing, and that they had to get rid of it all, you’d probably hit resistance, too. Or worse, they’d take your advice, go out on some miserable first dates and only further reinforce what will become Nice Guyness.
For comparison purposes, humans regularly fail the Turing test. So I don’t think it’s just high intelligence that can give you trouble in the dating realm.
Trumping this stupid with a full-blown “Stupid, stupid Catholic Church”, a Brazillian archbishop has ordered the excommunication of everyone involved in helping a 9 year-old pregnant rape and family sexual abuse victim in getting an abortion, but not the child herself. All part of the seriously conservative shift that’s been on since the Inquisition head became the Pope. Her circumstances have nothing to do with it, because according to the inflexible law, anyone involved in an abortion (who isn’t an innocent, like the child) commits mortal, murderous sin. If the child were older, I suspect she would have been included on the excommunication as well. More reasons for Catholicism to become a fringe element in societies. I was going to say “in the United States”, but then I think of “pro-life” movements and how problems the other monotheists have with Catholics probably isn’t about their abortion stance. Besides, we’re a special case. We come up with demented things like the Midwest teen Sex Show, which talks about sex but doesn’t show any of it.
In international waters, the attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team has the opposition leader in Pakistan claiming the country's security has failed. Politics. The Sudanese president thumbed his nose at the International Criminal Court yesterday as they issued a warrant for his arrest on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity in how the Darfur situation has played out. International aid agencies were expelled from the country as a result of the warrant.
The Telegraph paints Mr. Chavez's decision to impose price controls on food so that everyone still can afford to eat as a bad thing. Economically speaking, it might be, but angry and hungry poor have a tendency to turn humane execution devices into mass-murder machines against the upper classes.
Domestically, a Wikipedia screenshot, some digital forensics, a sequence of Twitter tweeting, and finally, a phone call to someone who knew what they were doing, and a school bomb threat ends with evacuation and the person making the threat in custody. As it turns out, it was a prank done by one friend, signed in another’s name. the likely result, however, will be expulsion. Makes me wonder whether it’s really true that people have to go past the line to figure out where it is.
Merrill Lynch executives are being subpoenaed about the $209 million USD they gave their executives and workers as bonuses, because giving bonuses while being bailed out is going to trip the logic circuits of just about everybody.
Also a symptom of the economy, with his house slated for foreclosure, and the police ready to evict him from the house, a man shot himself in the head. Having run out of options, this seemed like a good idea. It’s part of a trend happening in the down economy. Losing one’s shelter and/or one’s means of living make living not look like its worth much.
As with any political organization, there are some Senate Democrats who don't like the omnibus spending bill working its way through the body. Also noted - some Republicans like the bill and will work to pass it. I still want to know when our system of government developed backbenchers and strict adherence to party line as the requirements.
Comedian Rush Limbaugh is reveling in his new status as head of the Republican Party, considering it a boost for his ideals (and his ratings, no doubt) and good that people are turning to him to get an alternative from the mainstream media. Whether his opposition can succesfully tie him and the Republican Party together and then sink them both, using him as the millstone is yet to be determined, but Republicans aren’t necessarily doing themselves any favors by continuing their current tactics.
Although he may be facing a rivalry bid from Mr. Beck with his We Surround Them idea, where he lays out nine principles he believes in, and asks people to send him their picture if they believe in seven of the nine, to show how many more people are truly conservative and hold the power of changing their government and world. (Probably by supporting the appropriate faction of Republicanism, but that’s not been revealed yet.) More on the principles and things in another post, most likely. He’d get support from Mr. Henninger's call for the resurgence of Ronald Ragan's ideas, which, when properly explained and orated, will be immensely popular and lead the country out of the economic wilderness to the Promised Land.
The President opened a forum on health care reform today, which could result in some new rules, laws, and material to help us find a system that actually works for eveyone. One of the Republicans in attendance stated that he thought health care was a privilege, not a right, referring to people who choose not to pay for health insurance. How many people, praytell, do not have health insurance because they choose not to pay for it compared to the amount of people who do not have health insurance because they cannot afford the premiums and their employer does not provide, or who have disqualifying conditions that no insurer would take on? And saying that the provision of health care for all persons in the country was ”socialism“ and ”class warfare“ is pretty bizarre. Unless you think that giving the lower classes the ability to not have to worry about ruinous premiums or putting off health until they become emergencies is class warfare, because it lets them become a lot more class-mobile than they currently are and you don’t want ”those people“ in your clubs.
Elsewhere, perhaps of interest to our ”LGBT people are still people“ department, The California Supreme Court is reviewing the legality of the constitutional amendment passed as Proposition 8 in November. This is a matter of procedure more than of content, with the question being whether the initiative process was insufficient for changing the Consitution, because by affecting the rights of the people, the matters in Prop 8 consituted a revision instead of an amendment, which requires passage by houses of the Legislature.
Pastor Dan calls out right wingnuts - if you want to ban abortion, stand up and say so and get legislators to put a bill in - don't be chickenshits and ask people to put anti-abortion riders in appropriations bills. Don’t pervert the political process, stand by your convictions and let others ridicule you for them.
Starting the opinions, Kim Stanley Robinson says we need to stop the "multigenerational Ponzi scheme" of capitalism and climate change denial so that the world can pull itself up into a higher standard of living. This requires trusting and acting on what our science says about carbon emissions. So the governments need to bring carbon costs up to their true values and strongly encourage carbon-neutral power and infrastructure, advocate for social justice and rights for everyone, and transition away from ”free market capitalism“ into a larger, more globally based system, including education in business schools about environmental matters, biology, and the effects of their work in business. Plus, we need people studying ”postcapitalism“ to help us find these things and ease the transition. Neat and necessary, that’s for sure. Mr. Bryce thinks that trying to get away from hydrocarbons is foolish, as is any system that imposes additional costs on them. So every thought looking forward has its detractors.
Mr. Blankley submits a phrase he hopes gets coined, "Obama Lied; The Economy Died", based solely on what the President has done for the first month in stimulus spending, proposed tax increases, and the reaction of the markets to this and other units of policy in the Obama presidency, like green jobs and alternative energy, that Mr. Blankley and others are convinced will spawn new bureaucracies and intrusions by the government into their lives. Thus, by saying he’s not into big government, Mr. Obama is fibbing, and the economy is paying for it. Mr. Stossel would adopt that cry in a heartbeat, calling Mr. Obama’s pledge to cut waste and fraud from the budget hollow and ineffective, with the WSJ complaining about the resurgence of earmarks in the omnibus spending bill, even though the official line is that there aren't any, Mr. Turd Blossom claiming the President is an outright liar based on what he promised and what he's delivering (in the very narrow band of the economy, and even then, it is proabbly premature to say ”Promises broken“), and Mr. Sullum providing support on the idea that calling increased taxes savings is a problem, as well as repeating the refrain that tax cuts are inherently superior to anything that government can do. Mr. Martin would pick up on that theme and run with it, based on the government's response to the ice storms in the Midwest, what he believes is a perfect analogue for the previous administrator’s response to Hurricane Katrina, so that we can now also claim that ”Barack Obama doesn’t care about white people“ in addition to Mr. Blankley’s statement above.
Last out, the Slacktivist tackles the question of Hitler in Hell, and comes out with a well-thought piece on how much the Humes want justice to be served... to the other guy.
In technology, a bionic eye has been successfully implanted and a man blind for thirty years now has rudimentary vision. Sw33t!
Also, the human genome as an audio broadcast, a five-sense virtual reality experience, using fabrication printers to print three-dimensonal movie model expressions, at a cheaper cost and finer detail than many sculptors can achieve, designing and building a mobile emergency laboratory for soldiers that intends to stabilize them long enough to get tehm to a hospital where further work can be done, and a cancer treatment technique that could also be modified to make stun guns more effective.
Last for tonight, your Cool Thing - The EFF launches the Surveillance Self-Defense Project, a way of informing you, the user, about security, things that threaten it, and ways of protecting yourself from being snooped on by people you don’t want to know your information. It focuses on government agents that will follow the law, but can help with other adversaries, as well. There’s also the Eyeborg, a camera fitted to a prosthetic that will record and transmit what the wearer sees. Good for making documentaries abuot surveillance and the like.
Starting up top and getting some part of the stupid out of the way with a doctor telling us that if you're smart, you're prone to more trouble dating. If you don’t want my word on it, read The Weirdo's take on it and understand it all in much less text. According to this doc, smart people apparently focus on other things instead of building relationships with people, which leads to feeling like those achievements should net them love, which turns us into Nice Guys (and Girls), who get in the way of our own potential success, and then knock out most of the dating pool as being insufficient for us. So, it’s all our own fault that we can’t find a date, or even a one-night stand, and our further failures only reinforce this until we’re bitter shells of Nice Guys. Um. Reality check, incoming. If, at some point, you get pegged as the Smart One, the Nerd, the Brain, the whatever, all throughout the hell that is primary education, your label dictates how many people will behave around you. It only takes so many mud baths, people edging away from you, being made fun of, generally sent to the outer rings of the popularity clique, and sycophants using you for your brains instead of actually trying for genuine interaction before you decide that the odds are going to be against you in finding someone worth dating. I think most of The Smart Ones recognize that all that wonderful brain talent means squat when it comes to relationships, but if nobody’s looks like they’d give them a chance to learn the ropes, then there’s no point in trying, is there?
Which makes that whole “exclude 95% of the population” bit pretty easy - you want to meet someone who sounds or feels like they’re genuinely interested in you and are willing to make the effort to get to know you (and have you get to know them) so that any changes to style and delivery that need to be made come from a place of understanding, rather than jumping straight into “Well, if you changed yourself into something more like the people you hated and excluded you, and didn’t give off such a smart person aloof air, you’d do better.” Which is what this advice is, make no mistake. Stop being such an egghead, smart person. Let go of the thing that’s brought you solace or praise and try to be like everyone else as much as you can. Be more jock-like aggressive, men. Be more tramp-like sexual, women. Is it any wonder that a lot of Nice Guys appear out of this sequence? After all, if you told most people that everything they had done to this point meant nothing or worse than nothing, and that they had to get rid of it all, you’d probably hit resistance, too. Or worse, they’d take your advice, go out on some miserable first dates and only further reinforce what will become Nice Guyness.
For comparison purposes, humans regularly fail the Turing test. So I don’t think it’s just high intelligence that can give you trouble in the dating realm.
Trumping this stupid with a full-blown “Stupid, stupid Catholic Church”, a Brazillian archbishop has ordered the excommunication of everyone involved in helping a 9 year-old pregnant rape and family sexual abuse victim in getting an abortion, but not the child herself. All part of the seriously conservative shift that’s been on since the Inquisition head became the Pope. Her circumstances have nothing to do with it, because according to the inflexible law, anyone involved in an abortion (who isn’t an innocent, like the child) commits mortal, murderous sin. If the child were older, I suspect she would have been included on the excommunication as well. More reasons for Catholicism to become a fringe element in societies. I was going to say “in the United States”, but then I think of “pro-life” movements and how problems the other monotheists have with Catholics probably isn’t about their abortion stance. Besides, we’re a special case. We come up with demented things like the Midwest teen Sex Show, which talks about sex but doesn’t show any of it.
In international waters, the attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team has the opposition leader in Pakistan claiming the country's security has failed. Politics. The Sudanese president thumbed his nose at the International Criminal Court yesterday as they issued a warrant for his arrest on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity in how the Darfur situation has played out. International aid agencies were expelled from the country as a result of the warrant.
The Telegraph paints Mr. Chavez's decision to impose price controls on food so that everyone still can afford to eat as a bad thing. Economically speaking, it might be, but angry and hungry poor have a tendency to turn humane execution devices into mass-murder machines against the upper classes.
Domestically, a Wikipedia screenshot, some digital forensics, a sequence of Twitter tweeting, and finally, a phone call to someone who knew what they were doing, and a school bomb threat ends with evacuation and the person making the threat in custody. As it turns out, it was a prank done by one friend, signed in another’s name. the likely result, however, will be expulsion. Makes me wonder whether it’s really true that people have to go past the line to figure out where it is.
Merrill Lynch executives are being subpoenaed about the $209 million USD they gave their executives and workers as bonuses, because giving bonuses while being bailed out is going to trip the logic circuits of just about everybody.
Also a symptom of the economy, with his house slated for foreclosure, and the police ready to evict him from the house, a man shot himself in the head. Having run out of options, this seemed like a good idea. It’s part of a trend happening in the down economy. Losing one’s shelter and/or one’s means of living make living not look like its worth much.
As with any political organization, there are some Senate Democrats who don't like the omnibus spending bill working its way through the body. Also noted - some Republicans like the bill and will work to pass it. I still want to know when our system of government developed backbenchers and strict adherence to party line as the requirements.
Comedian Rush Limbaugh is reveling in his new status as head of the Republican Party, considering it a boost for his ideals (and his ratings, no doubt) and good that people are turning to him to get an alternative from the mainstream media. Whether his opposition can succesfully tie him and the Republican Party together and then sink them both, using him as the millstone is yet to be determined, but Republicans aren’t necessarily doing themselves any favors by continuing their current tactics.
Although he may be facing a rivalry bid from Mr. Beck with his We Surround Them idea, where he lays out nine principles he believes in, and asks people to send him their picture if they believe in seven of the nine, to show how many more people are truly conservative and hold the power of changing their government and world. (Probably by supporting the appropriate faction of Republicanism, but that’s not been revealed yet.) More on the principles and things in another post, most likely. He’d get support from Mr. Henninger's call for the resurgence of Ronald Ragan's ideas, which, when properly explained and orated, will be immensely popular and lead the country out of the economic wilderness to the Promised Land.
The President opened a forum on health care reform today, which could result in some new rules, laws, and material to help us find a system that actually works for eveyone. One of the Republicans in attendance stated that he thought health care was a privilege, not a right, referring to people who choose not to pay for health insurance. How many people, praytell, do not have health insurance because they choose not to pay for it compared to the amount of people who do not have health insurance because they cannot afford the premiums and their employer does not provide, or who have disqualifying conditions that no insurer would take on? And saying that the provision of health care for all persons in the country was ”socialism“ and ”class warfare“ is pretty bizarre. Unless you think that giving the lower classes the ability to not have to worry about ruinous premiums or putting off health until they become emergencies is class warfare, because it lets them become a lot more class-mobile than they currently are and you don’t want ”those people“ in your clubs.
Elsewhere, perhaps of interest to our ”LGBT people are still people“ department, The California Supreme Court is reviewing the legality of the constitutional amendment passed as Proposition 8 in November. This is a matter of procedure more than of content, with the question being whether the initiative process was insufficient for changing the Consitution, because by affecting the rights of the people, the matters in Prop 8 consituted a revision instead of an amendment, which requires passage by houses of the Legislature.
Pastor Dan calls out right wingnuts - if you want to ban abortion, stand up and say so and get legislators to put a bill in - don't be chickenshits and ask people to put anti-abortion riders in appropriations bills. Don’t pervert the political process, stand by your convictions and let others ridicule you for them.
Starting the opinions, Kim Stanley Robinson says we need to stop the "multigenerational Ponzi scheme" of capitalism and climate change denial so that the world can pull itself up into a higher standard of living. This requires trusting and acting on what our science says about carbon emissions. So the governments need to bring carbon costs up to their true values and strongly encourage carbon-neutral power and infrastructure, advocate for social justice and rights for everyone, and transition away from ”free market capitalism“ into a larger, more globally based system, including education in business schools about environmental matters, biology, and the effects of their work in business. Plus, we need people studying ”postcapitalism“ to help us find these things and ease the transition. Neat and necessary, that’s for sure. Mr. Bryce thinks that trying to get away from hydrocarbons is foolish, as is any system that imposes additional costs on them. So every thought looking forward has its detractors.
Mr. Blankley submits a phrase he hopes gets coined, "Obama Lied; The Economy Died", based solely on what the President has done for the first month in stimulus spending, proposed tax increases, and the reaction of the markets to this and other units of policy in the Obama presidency, like green jobs and alternative energy, that Mr. Blankley and others are convinced will spawn new bureaucracies and intrusions by the government into their lives. Thus, by saying he’s not into big government, Mr. Obama is fibbing, and the economy is paying for it. Mr. Stossel would adopt that cry in a heartbeat, calling Mr. Obama’s pledge to cut waste and fraud from the budget hollow and ineffective, with the WSJ complaining about the resurgence of earmarks in the omnibus spending bill, even though the official line is that there aren't any, Mr. Turd Blossom claiming the President is an outright liar based on what he promised and what he's delivering (in the very narrow band of the economy, and even then, it is proabbly premature to say ”Promises broken“), and Mr. Sullum providing support on the idea that calling increased taxes savings is a problem, as well as repeating the refrain that tax cuts are inherently superior to anything that government can do. Mr. Martin would pick up on that theme and run with it, based on the government's response to the ice storms in the Midwest, what he believes is a perfect analogue for the previous administrator’s response to Hurricane Katrina, so that we can now also claim that ”Barack Obama doesn’t care about white people“ in addition to Mr. Blankley’s statement above.
Last out, the Slacktivist tackles the question of Hitler in Hell, and comes out with a well-thought piece on how much the Humes want justice to be served... to the other guy.
In technology, a bionic eye has been successfully implanted and a man blind for thirty years now has rudimentary vision. Sw33t!
Also, the human genome as an audio broadcast, a five-sense virtual reality experience, using fabrication printers to print three-dimensonal movie model expressions, at a cheaper cost and finer detail than many sculptors can achieve, designing and building a mobile emergency laboratory for soldiers that intends to stabilize them long enough to get tehm to a hospital where further work can be done, and a cancer treatment technique that could also be modified to make stun guns more effective.
Last for tonight, your Cool Thing - The EFF launches the Surveillance Self-Defense Project, a way of informing you, the user, about security, things that threaten it, and ways of protecting yourself from being snooped on by people you don’t want to know your information. It focuses on government agents that will follow the law, but can help with other adversaries, as well. There’s also the Eyeborg, a camera fitted to a prosthetic that will record and transmit what the wearer sees. Good for making documentaries abuot surveillance and the like.