In your own space, share a favorite piece of original canon (a TV episode, a song, a favorite interview, a book, a scene from a movie, etc) and explain why you love it so much.
Why shouldn't the collective noun for canon be a broadside? It tends to hit hard and its very likely to sink ships, so that seems like an appropriate word to use.
More seriously, though, this one is a lot easier for a fan whose canon is moving pictures, audio, or a visual art, because places like YouTube or Imgur make it ridiculously easy to find and embed the item you're looking for, even if the copyright laws frown on the creation of such things. (In the United States, at least, you can argue that an excerpt for critical or scholarly purposes qualifies as a fair use exception.) If your canon is textual, though, that can make it harder to just easily share your best bits and have it deliver the impact intended, because there's a lot more context that needs to be delivered to make text sing than other media that can deliver it in their own way. Not everyone hears characters in the same voice. And sometimes the performance of the textual material can be crystalizing, such that if you don't want to see it that way, you start using that as your reference of comparison.
So let's take a look at a piece of the Harry Potter canon that I quite like. Unsurprisingly, it's not actually any part of the narrative of Potter, but a story within the story, the Tale of the Three Brothers. A wiki with a reasonable summary of the story, if not the full text itself. This is supposedly one of the tales told to children, what appears to be a lesson about hubris and demanding what you want, only to have those same things come back to harm you later. It's almost a Monkey's Paw story, with the way the artifacts get used. Textually, it's pretty slight, almost a fable or nursery rhyme of a thing.
Of course, then you get to hear it.
The Three Brothers as an audiobook, for example.
Or then you get to see it.
The Three Brothers as a stage puppet show.
Most of us, though, get to see it when it comes to us in a movie form.
The Three Brothers as an animatic, narration Emma Watson.
For the intended audience, it's some worldbuilding in the context of learning about the truth of the artifacts that Harry has owned or is seeking. And it makes a nice story as a quiet breather in between scenes of intense action.
For the slightly older audience, those of us that might have had opportunity to take a class on works of the English language (or lucky enough to major in the Medium Aevum), this story might raise a ping or two. Where else might I have heard a story about three men meeting Death, getting promised a reward, and then having Death come to collect them because of their greed?
(Jo Rowling mentioned that this story is possibly based on the Pardoner's Tale herself, so you would be in the right ballpark to think this story might be a Whole Plot Reference, even if some of the details get changed.)
I like the animatic, and I think Emma Watson can narrate audiobooks forever, but I also really enjoy this as a microcosm of the nature of stories. Fanfiction is Older Than Dirt, given that we're fairly certain the Aeneid is fanwork of the Odyssey, and it shows up in the most interesting of places, even if the acknowledgment isn't direct, or someone isn't fully cognizant of the references they're making. Even here, in what was supposed to be a child's tale, in a small way, in a thing that is supposed to be an original story, there are bits that are from other stories woven in, little fan parts and pieces all the same.
And that's why I like canon and fanon and the way they interact and pull and push and reinvent themselves and talk to each other, officially and unofficially, over the generations and the places and the archives. Each person charts their path and travels it, and their footprints stay for others to see, and possibly walk themselves.
Why shouldn't the collective noun for canon be a broadside? It tends to hit hard and its very likely to sink ships, so that seems like an appropriate word to use.
More seriously, though, this one is a lot easier for a fan whose canon is moving pictures, audio, or a visual art, because places like YouTube or Imgur make it ridiculously easy to find and embed the item you're looking for, even if the copyright laws frown on the creation of such things. (In the United States, at least, you can argue that an excerpt for critical or scholarly purposes qualifies as a fair use exception.) If your canon is textual, though, that can make it harder to just easily share your best bits and have it deliver the impact intended, because there's a lot more context that needs to be delivered to make text sing than other media that can deliver it in their own way. Not everyone hears characters in the same voice. And sometimes the performance of the textual material can be crystalizing, such that if you don't want to see it that way, you start using that as your reference of comparison.
So let's take a look at a piece of the Harry Potter canon that I quite like. Unsurprisingly, it's not actually any part of the narrative of Potter, but a story within the story, the Tale of the Three Brothers. A wiki with a reasonable summary of the story, if not the full text itself. This is supposedly one of the tales told to children, what appears to be a lesson about hubris and demanding what you want, only to have those same things come back to harm you later. It's almost a Monkey's Paw story, with the way the artifacts get used. Textually, it's pretty slight, almost a fable or nursery rhyme of a thing.
Of course, then you get to hear it.
The Three Brothers as an audiobook, for example.
Or then you get to see it.
The Three Brothers as a stage puppet show.
Most of us, though, get to see it when it comes to us in a movie form.
The Three Brothers as an animatic, narration Emma Watson.
For the intended audience, it's some worldbuilding in the context of learning about the truth of the artifacts that Harry has owned or is seeking. And it makes a nice story as a quiet breather in between scenes of intense action.
For the slightly older audience, those of us that might have had opportunity to take a class on works of the English language (or lucky enough to major in the Medium Aevum), this story might raise a ping or two. Where else might I have heard a story about three men meeting Death, getting promised a reward, and then having Death come to collect them because of their greed?
(Jo Rowling mentioned that this story is possibly based on the Pardoner's Tale herself, so you would be in the right ballpark to think this story might be a Whole Plot Reference, even if some of the details get changed.)
I like the animatic, and I think Emma Watson can narrate audiobooks forever, but I also really enjoy this as a microcosm of the nature of stories. Fanfiction is Older Than Dirt, given that we're fairly certain the Aeneid is fanwork of the Odyssey, and it shows up in the most interesting of places, even if the acknowledgment isn't direct, or someone isn't fully cognizant of the references they're making. Even here, in what was supposed to be a child's tale, in a small way, in a thing that is supposed to be an original story, there are bits that are from other stories woven in, little fan parts and pieces all the same.
And that's why I like canon and fanon and the way they interact and pull and push and reinvent themselves and talk to each other, officially and unofficially, over the generations and the places and the archives. Each person charts their path and travels it, and their footprints stay for others to see, and possibly walk themselves.