A State of A Union.
Feb. 7th, 2020 08:09 pmThe Constitution of the United States demands that from time to time the President inform the Congress of the state of the union and lay out goals and policies the administration plans to pursue.
Given the current administrator, it's very tempting to sum up everything simply as "Lies, Dammed Lies, and Statistics" and call it a night, there's always the possibility that something useful will be present and need commentary.
This is also in the context of the impeachment process still occurring at that moment, although the day afterward would be the vote to acquit the current administrator of the charges bright against him. By this point in time, the Republicans of the Senate had already signaled their complete unwillingness to treat the charges as anything other than partisan decisions. Because of that decision, and all the other ones that have been made that prove the Republicans put their party and their selfish interests above that of that nation, I wouldn't be opposed to that group of Republicans obtaining the title "the treacherous Republicans" or possibly even "the traitorous Republicans." (With the exception of Willard "Mitt" Romney, who did more than lip service to his professed faith in a speech and then voted to convict on the abuse of power article.)
( Let's begin )
Given the current administrator, it's very tempting to sum up everything simply as "Lies, Dammed Lies, and Statistics" and call it a night, there's always the possibility that something useful will be present and need commentary.
This is also in the context of the impeachment process still occurring at that moment, although the day afterward would be the vote to acquit the current administrator of the charges bright against him. By this point in time, the Republicans of the Senate had already signaled their complete unwillingness to treat the charges as anything other than partisan decisions. Because of that decision, and all the other ones that have been made that prove the Republicans put their party and their selfish interests above that of that nation, I wouldn't be opposed to that group of Republicans obtaining the title "the treacherous Republicans" or possibly even "the traitorous Republicans." (With the exception of Willard "Mitt" Romney, who did more than lip service to his professed faith in a speech and then voted to convict on the abuse of power article.)
( Let's begin )