Profile
Silver Adept
Materials Of Potential Interest
Active Entries
- 1: The problem is that they don't stop - Early June 0205
- 2: The usual amount of strange things in place - Early May 02025
- 3: The Chronicling of Some of It - Late April 02025
- 4: Felicitations of the end of tax season in the U.S. - Early April 02025
- 5: They're not showing signs of slowing or stopping - Late March 02025
- 6: Snowflake Challenge 02025 #12: Which of These Recommendations Will You Be Talking About Tomorrow?
- 7: Through the shortest of the months - Late February 02025
- 8: Snowflake Challenge 02025 #15: Going Out On A Happy Note
- 9: Another very busy two weeks of things - Early February 02025
- 10: Snowflake Challenge 02025 #14: Ten Thousand Community Adventures
Style Credit
- Base style: Refried Tablet by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
zvi and - Theme: Black Eye II by dancing_serpent
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-12-10 07:20 pm (UTC)Ahh. *nods* I seem not to have changed the plane, at all, but rather shifted the target of the argument: having solidified that to choose one's actions in such a regard is one's prerogative, whether another asks that one act differently or not, now I'm challenging the asking itself...
Looking at the beginning of the situation, it seems as though what I was originally doing was challenging the asking: it occurs to me briefly to wonder whether I could have gone straight to the direct challenging of the asking, but it makes sense that I would have to first show that something was justified before I showed that a thing against it was unjustified.
...which is not tantamount to the willingness to supress the unjustified thing, nor the belief that it should be supressed, but rather a disagreement that it should have been said in the first place... not to stop a thing being said, but rather after it has been said show that the saying/asking is flawed... no, my word before was better: 'unreasonable'.
Of course, the second stage is not yet cleared. Just treat this sub-comment (comment? third comment for this level?) as an analysis (self-analysis? Partial self-analysis?) of my own debating style. Or not style, rather progression... does this count as a debate? Hmm. *thoughts resharpen a little* Even if it doesn't, that's the closest word that comes to mind right now, and for now it will have to serve.
*smiles (slightly? oh look, thoughts unsharpening again...); posts* (Heh... whatever works.)