Materials Of Potential Interest
Active Entries
- 1: The problem is that they don't stop - Early June 0205
- 2: The usual amount of strange things in place - Early May 02025
- 3: The Chronicling of Some of It - Late April 02025
- 4: Felicitations of the end of tax season in the U.S. - Early April 02025
- 5: They're not showing signs of slowing or stopping - Late March 02025
- 6: Snowflake Challenge 02025 #12: Which of These Recommendations Will You Be Talking About Tomorrow?
- 7: Through the shortest of the months - Late February 02025
- 8: Snowflake Challenge 02025 #15: Going Out On A Happy Note
- 9: Another very busy two weeks of things - Early February 02025
- 10: Snowflake Challenge 02025 #14: Ten Thousand Community Adventures
Style Credit
- Base style: Refried Tablet by and
- Theme: Black Eye II by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 06:31 pm (UTC)I'd argue that not all colors can be trademarked, but colors that strongly associated with their respective brands should be. They're not being taken entirely off the domain, they can be used in other logos, just not with the other color part of the trademark.
Here's a better example, Maize and Blue. Do you think you can identify UM by those two colors, what about those specific shades of yellow and blue? Now what if Ohio State wanted to switch school colors to those specific maize and blue colors, even with an entirely different logo. What if, they decide that when their football team is doing well, they'll wear the scarlet and grey and when they're losing they'll wear maize and blue (not that I'd mind :P). Should UM have the right to protect their use of that color combination?