silveradept: A head shot of a  librarian in a floral print shirt wearing goggles with text squiggles on them, holding a pencil. (Librarian Goggles)
[personal profile] silveradept
Greetings! This is the Write Every Day Check-in post for 04 August 02019.

I was worried I was going to run out of things to talk about during these days, but then, as part of previous linklists that I hadn't gotten to, suddenly, material appeared! So thank you, people who didn't know this was going to be needed, for helping me find things to talk about.

In this case, it's [personal profile] dolorosa_12 talking about narrative dealbreakers, those parts of a story that aren't tropes that need to die and stay dead, but that will fling you out of a story all the same. One of the big ones that will do it to me is if the worldbuilding becomes obviously inconsistent with itself, and there's no hint from the narrative that this situation is odd or will be explainable later. I also tend to get shirty at characters that start behaving inconsistently without there being a reasonable explanation as to why. The Giving of Grief had a character that everyone acknowledged was behaving wildly out of character for themselves, but then, to a person, decided that it wasn't worth investigating, and instead that it was just a woman being her incomprehensible self. And this is why the Giving of Grief contains swear words.

What are the things that throw you from a story, even though they're not necessarily inherently terrible?

Today I put in a couple of paragraphs on an assignment, but really, a lot of what I was doing was re-ripping and putting together video content. Not because I'm making a vid or anything, but because I wanted to have single-file versions of a few things in my video collection that I didn't have before. I'm struggling a bit with the characterization in this assignment, because I'm trying to believably depict someone who is torn between going all in and risking the potential disaster that comes from that and not going all the way in, but risking the wrath of the person they need to accomplish their goals. It's tricky.

People who have checked in with writing on Day 1: [personal profile] alexcat, [personal profile] alexseanchai, [personal profile] athaia, [personal profile] auroracloud, [personal profile] carenejeans, [personal profile] chanter1944, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] lferion, [personal profile] magnetic_pole, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] shopfront, [personal profile] silveradept, [personal profile] sonia, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] yasaman, [personal profile] ysilme.

People who have checked in with writing on Day 2: [personal profile] alexcat, [personal profile] alexseanchai, [personal profile] athaia, [personal profile] auroracloud, [personal profile] carenejeans, [personal profile] chanter1944, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] lferion, [personal profile] magnetic_pole, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] shopfront, [personal profile] silveradept, [personal profile] sonia, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] yasaman, [personal profile] ysilme.

People who have checked in with writing on Day 3: [personal profile] alexcat, [personal profile] alexseanchai, [personal profile] auroracloud, [personal profile] carenejeans, [personal profile] chanter1944, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] lferion, [personal profile] magnetic_pole, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] shopfront, [personal profile] silveradept, [personal profile] sonia, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] talkingtothesky, [personal profile] yasaman, [personal profile] ysilme.

People who have checked in with writing on Day 4: [personal profile] alexseanchai, [personal profile] auroracloud, [personal profile] bladespark, [personal profile] carenejeans, [personal profile] chanter1944, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] lferion, [personal profile] magnetic_pole, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] shopfront, [personal profile] silveradept, [personal profile] sonia, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] yasaman, [personal profile] ysilme.
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 04:50 am (UTC)
alexseanchai: Katsuki Yuuri wearing a blue jacket and his glasses and holding a poodle, in front of the asexual pride flag with a rainbow heart inset. (Default)
From: [personal profile] alexseanchai
1K ish into the thing I mentioned yesterday. Stuck on whose PoV the next bit is in. Character C needs to be present for practical strategic reasons—or, well, not C necessarily, but it would be out of character for A to bring no backup, and C's skill set means he'd be the best strategic choice even if he weren't the best choice for emotional reasons on both A's and B's parts—but the plot is all A and B talking shit out and none of these three want C even to hear the conversation (he has to listen because the said strategic reasons, but like), never mind participate. So the scene could be C PoV as an observer who's one ring-theory ring out from the action, which would give him some actual narrative purpose other than being an awkward wooden block in the corner. But the interesting shit is what's going on in A's and B's heads!

And I hate changing PoV in the middle of an emotionally intense bit. I think I only successfully managed it in "Suppose I Do", and that was half because the two conversations could not be conveyed via the same PoV and half because neither the simultaneity nor the narrative parallels could be conveyed half so easily if the two conversations were to be read sequentially instead of cutting back and forth.
Depth: 3

Date: 2019-08-05 05:12 am (UTC)
alexseanchai: Katsuki Yuuri wearing a blue jacket and his glasses and holding a poodle, in front of the asexual pride flag with a rainbow heart inset. (Default)
From: [personal profile] alexseanchai
really rather not!

I mean I absolutely could have D walk in, for any of three values of D, but then attention would have to shift from these clowns sitting down to talk about their feelings to making sure D continues to know fuck-all?
Edited Date: 2019-08-05 05:14 am (UTC)
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 05:21 am (UTC)
bladespark: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bladespark
I think my biggest dealbreaker is the "One party is uncertain about sex, to the point where the sex scene could even possibly be characterized as rape, but after having had sex is sure they're in love now because it was so amazing." No. Just no. I don't even mind sex of dubious consent in stories, but it should be a difficult and troubling thing in some way, not lead to the realization of Twue Lurve.

Also reading Good Omens fics I've realized that making God a character is 99.99% of the time a bad idea and I really hate it. If you involve God directly as somebody who acts and intervenes in your narrative, you instantly bring to bear every single philosophical and moral debate about things like the problem of evil and the nature of free will, and most stories reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally do not need that stuff cluttering up their plots. Leave God out of it, seriously. So far I've seen exactly one GO fic that brings God in that I liked, and it was just for a single line.

And I've ranted elsewhere about the problem of thousand+ year old characters being virgins and then suddenly deciding to bang for no reason other than Finally Meeting The One. That soooooooooooooooooo doesn't work. If a character is so disconnected from sex and/or so disconnected from people that they've never met *anybody* at all they were attracted to in literal multiple lifetimes, then your story had better given them a damn good reason to suddenly be interested now. (Funnily enough this bothers me not at all in Good Omens fandom, because the angel and demon in that had a really good reason to not get too close to each other, and the canon story removed that reason right at the end, ergo...)
Depth: 2

Date: 2019-08-05 05:23 am (UTC)
bladespark: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bladespark
P.S. not doing write every day right now, I don't have the spoons to write every day and I don't want to send myself into a guilt spiral about missing a bunch of days, but I did write about 1.5k today, even if it was on something self-indulgent and frivolous, so that's good.
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 05:43 am (UTC)
sanguinity: woodcut by M.C. Escher, "Snakes" (Default)
From: [personal profile] sanguinity
Wrote some stuff in a continuation of my attempts to get the end of the story right; continued to fail to get the end of the story right.
Depth: 3

Date: 2019-08-05 04:41 pm (UTC)
sanguinity: woodcut by M.C. Escher, "Snakes" (Default)
From: [personal profile] sanguinity
It is! But many parts of this story has been stubborn; for something that's so lightweight, it's surprising how much trouble it's given me since I started.

But I'm leaving on vacation in minutes; maybe the backbrain can solve it while I'm gone.
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 05:55 am (UTC)
yasaman: picture of jasmine flower, with text yasaman (Default)
From: [personal profile] yasaman
Sunday is for adulting and errands, so just 259 words for me today.

Not sure if this counts as a narrative dealbreaker, but I guess it can be folded into a larger dealbreaker: epithets. I despise them. In close third person POV where the POV character does, in fact, know the other person's name, they throw me out of the POV. Even when the POV character doesn't know the other person's name, so many epithets strike me as actively OOC for the POV character, and in fact, not especially natural for any average person's POV. My epithet hatred is part of the larger narrative dealbreaker that is consistent use of language, descriptions, etc., that isn't in character, or is otherwise implausible for the POV character to use or notice. If a narrative breaks any close POV like that, it loses me.
Depth: 3

Date: 2019-08-05 09:49 pm (UTC)
yasaman: picture of jasmine flower, with text yasaman (Default)
From: [personal profile] yasaman

lol you might just be reading better fic than I am. I'm thinking of epithets like "the blond" and "the brunette" and "the smaller man" or "the younger man." Using a title is preferable when the POV character does not in fact know the other person's name, or where the name isn't important, since I think that's the norm for most people, i.e., "the barista" or "the bus driver" or whatever. It's when the POV character does in fact know the other person's name, and yet, the narration is still using the likes of "the wizard" or "the captain", that I feel flames on the side of my face. There are very few circumstances in which I'm okay with such epithets. I know a lot of writers use them because they think it avoids confusion when two or more characters have the same pronouns, but epithets are not the solution! The solution is to structure your sentences more clearly, use actual names, or let context do its job.

Depth: 5

Date: 2019-08-06 12:33 am (UTC)
yasaman: picture of jasmine flower, with text yasaman (Default)
From: [personal profile] yasaman

oh I've definitely done it myself too, especially with "the other man" because somehow that doesn't always ping as an epithet to me. just some time in recent years, it's started to especially infuriate me.

Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 07:00 am (UTC)
china_shop: Close-up of Zhao Yunlan grinning (Default)
From: [personal profile] china_shop
I find the dealbreaker question easiest to think about in terms of Kdramas, and there it's pretty much: if the obstacle to a het romance is his personality, I stop watching. (I don't mind so much if it's her personality.) ;-P

5th: 173 words, purely because I wanted to check in with more than just an alibi sentence. It's mostly been a day of to-do lists and minor adulting, with a little bit of meta discussion on the side.
Depth: 3

Date: 2019-08-05 08:41 pm (UTC)
china_shop: Historical Kdrama: close-up of the prince and his guard looking like they're about to kiss (Kdrama - Byungyeon/Yeong)
From: [personal profile] china_shop
The kind of Kdramas I watch are usually 16 episodes long, complete, and a lot like fluffy romance novels (or 100k slow-burn fluffy get-together fanfic). As with romance novels, there's a subgenre in which the leading man is rich, handsome and extremely arrogant, and gradually learns to be a human being over the course of the show, but it's almost always too little too late for me. ;-p I prefer the obstacles to the romance to be external to the pairing, or more complicated than just "he's an asshole."
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 10:07 am (UTC)
ysilme: Wordle with writing terms "ranting denial typing pain story decision tea". (Wordle: write every day)
From: [personal profile] ysilme
I'm finally back home. Writing did, as always, happen every day, although on the two days spent mainly in the car it's only been around 50is each, written on my phone, and 511 new words and about half an hour of editing for the 2nd.
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 10:37 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] chanter1944
Something like 100 words, because I've had company. Goa/Amita showed up, which I knew she was going to, but now she's properly written in.
Depth: 3

Date: 2019-08-06 02:53 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] chanter1944
This gal needed an 'okay, I can write your first snippet now!' :) She's being justifiably snarky about her other sort-of-parental connection, who's not currently present.
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 12:29 pm (UTC)
sylvanwitch: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sylvanwitch
Interesting food for thought--thanks for sharing. Inconsistency in characterization or violating the rules of the author's own world without explanation (eventual or immediate) definitely frustrates me as a reader and as a writer. That said, I know that if I'm writing something long-form, I worry about variations in tone, for example, during the process, which I hope to catch in edits (and have caught by beta readers and/or editors) but which I'm also never entirely sure I have avoided. WED has actually helped with this concern because I've learned so much about the process of writing from simply doing it every day, if that makes any sense. Anyway, interesting stuff!

Day 4 was supposed to be the day I returned to editing the "ambush project" novel (that's the time travel lesbian romance that ambushed the lesbian space opera, in case you were wondering), but I wasn't feeling it--I mean, PROFOUNDLY was not feeling it. So I did a little flash fiction thing instead, which may or may not ever see the light of day, and called it a win.
Edited Date: 2019-08-05 12:32 pm (UTC)
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 02:23 pm (UTC)
lferion: Art of pink gillyflower on green background (Default)
From: [personal profile] lferion
Alibi sentences, and some plotting for the new section of the reverse bang fic.
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 04:06 pm (UTC)
auroracloud: a fountain pen against a sheet of paper and writing (writing)
From: [personal profile] auroracloud
I played around with my novel for a while, adding a few paragraphs, and then proceeded to do some much-needed plotting so I'll have a clearer idea on what scenes to work on next. I also started a possible new story that I so far don't know terribly much about, but it really wanted to be started, so I did.

Hmm, a lot of my dealbreakers seem to have to do with values stuff and how various (disenfranchised) groups are portrayed, for example gender stereotypes/roles that I hate, harmful tropes etc. For example, I really hate it when a woman getting/remaining/returning together with a formerly abusive man is shown as a happy ending just because the man seems nicer and more appreciative now. And being expected to believe in a romance between two characters just because they're of the opposite sexes and have spent a lot of time interacting with each other, even if there hasn't actually been even a dash of actual romantic chemistry that I could feel. People writing same-sex pairings usually bother to actually establish an attraction and interest, but writers with a firmly het mindset sometimes believe simply that man + woman = love. Equally, I tend to hate the "only one woman in the cast, who is Super Extra Special" tropes, but it varies a bit depending on how it's handled - sometimes it can just be a factor of the setting or very limited cast of characters and not feel like misogyny in camouflage. And oh, I really really hate it when female characters have no meaningful relationships with other women, or when the only women in the story hate each other or are rivals or jealous of each other.

I also hate it when friendship, especially between women, is present in the narrative only in order to break down, turn into emotional abuse, etc. There aren't enough friendship stories around that I care to constantly see stories just about friendships being venomous

I also have a knee-jerk hatred of Bury Your Gays* and all kinds of homophobia; and while I must admit to being less sensitive to harmful tropes involving POC and trans people due to not having such a personal relationship to the topic (also I live in a fairly ethnically monolithic country, so POC issues haven't been that present in the discussion here until recently), the more I learn about them the more I hate them when I notice them in the story, and they can turn me off as well.

*(I don't mean gay/lesbian/bi characters, or members of other minorities, should never ever die, because of course bad stuff can happen to anyone, but if the only representatives of those groups end up dying, and especially if that part of the plot isn't so well handled, it really easily starts to feel like invoking that trope and I get angry and upset.)
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 04:07 pm (UTC)
carenejeans: (Default)
From: [personal profile] carenejeans
I mostly worked on the nonfiction project, but edited some fiction I'm working on, including paring down the flashfic I started into a drabble. Which meant a negative word count. 8-)
Depth: 2

Date: 2019-08-07 07:06 am (UTC)
alexseanchai: Katsuki Yuuri wearing a blue jacket and his glasses and holding a poodle, in front of the asexual pride flag with a rainbow heart inset. (Default)
From: [personal profile] alexseanchai
If taking away words got the story closer to done, then I'd say it counts!
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 07:45 pm (UTC)
shopfront: Source: Captain America. Natasha with eyebrow raised mid-speaking (AV - Natasha is skeptical of you)
From: [personal profile] shopfront
Drama for the sake of drama! I realise I'm very schooled in fandom style reading preferences by now, and would happily pay for a full novel of cute characters noodling around together being adorable and domestic together. But I've been trying to read more published queer romances and sometimes the plot 'twists' are painfully unrealistic, especially in the second half of the books. I imagine there's probably plenty of straight romance novels that do this too and the romance genre is maybe just not my thing despite being like 90% of my fannish consumption, but I want to believe that a problem will actually drag the characters apart - not just watch them have a hissy fit over a minor problem and then flounce off for a few chapters only to pine and return to each other seemingly at random!

Or alternatively when I do believe that the characters would be parted by a problem, I am usually confused about why they were together in the first place *facepalm* My wife and I both have a very low tolerance for romantic drama in RL and sometimes side-eye friends and family about the same, so I suspect this is at least in part a me thing than a writers thing, but it's my personal bugbear.

Checking in for both the 4th and pre-emptively again for today/the 5th. Mostly just polishing fics again, though I did manage to add a decent chunk of words fleshing out one of them and I'm much happier with it now as a result, phew.
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 09:41 pm (UTC)
magnetic_pole: (Default)
From: [personal profile] magnetic_pole
I'm not sure I had a net gain of any words yesterday, but I found some old writing (2003!) that could be woven into the current chapter, so I did some editing.

The narrative thing is an interesting question. This is super hypocritical given my own behavior in real life, but I don't like too many "I love you"s or endearments. Odd, hm? :) Thanks for asking! M.
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-05 10:44 pm (UTC)
sonia: Quilted wall-hanging (Default)
From: [personal profile] sonia
Answered some email that was responding to a past article. Definitely counts as emotional labor, if not writing labor!
Depth: 1

Date: 2019-08-06 03:39 am (UTC)
cornerofmadness: Angel in drag holding up cards (Default)
From: [personal profile] cornerofmadness
I eeked out 574 words on [community profile] intoabar

worldbuilding can be a bar

Profile

silveradept: A kodama with a trombone. The trombone is playing music, even though it is held in a rest position (Default)
Silver Adept

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     12 3
4 56 78 910
1112 1314 15 16 17
18 1920 2122 2324
2526 2728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 29th, 2026 11:23 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios