Thinky-Thought: The Reconstruction of Creativity

[silveradept]

[Thinky-Thoughts are a perpetual beta thing. They invite comment and further discussion.]

So I wrote a thinky-thought about an article that talked about how school kills creativity impulses in children. bladespark took an issue with the conclusion, that we're very close to a death of creativity, with an empirical counterexample - creativity is in a much better place now than it has been before. Throw a stone anywhere, basically, and you'll find a lot of creative output.

It's an excellent point.

...but I feel like the two can co-exist, even though they're intertwined. And they can both be correct. So let's talk about some of the examples provided (and some other ones that I can think up), too.

1. Just because we can measure things better doesn't mean the rates are changing. Which makes sense because we're in the middle of being able to understand a lot of other things a lot better - things like the autism spectrum didn't have names even a little while ago, within my lifetime. The mysteries of the universe and the mind are starting to unlock as we find new ways of seeing them. So if we're starting to discover that the way we do schooling crushes creativity, we shouldn't worry that things are falling apart.
2. Beyond that, check out the sheer volume of STUFF! One corner of the Internet has millions (and MILLIONS) of users who clip right along in the hundreds of thousands of creative things per day. People can live their lives doing creative work easier than they could before. And that's just one corner of the Internet. So, (in a bit flippant way), cheer up, emo kid! We're doing great!


The counter to that is trying to prove a negative. Much like the President, we can measure how things are good, how things are bad, but we really can't measure how bad things could have been or how good things would be if were weren't doing these things. You could argue the idea that the Internet being international means you can't claim all those people as products of the American school system, and the like, but even if you went all proportional and finessed the numbers to be more statistically accurate, you still find yourself staring down a large swath of creativity every day.

More fruitfully, you could say that the explosion of creativity is because the bar is set so low these days - a person with technology and an Internet connection can share themselves with the world. Going that route, though, gets you into the discussion of whether creativity requires a minimum of success before you can count it. That's old-world thinking, though - Sturgeon's Law applies, sure, but if the bar is that you to have commercialized your work and/or make a living off of it, then a large swath of that very real creative explosion is erased. Going that route helps the position that schools are killing creativity by redirecting the insufficiently determined into some other profession or route. It's not a complete argument, though, because...
3. Kids are more resilient than you think. I know this from experience. And that's where I think we can have two arguments running concurrently that cross over but don't disturb each other too much. Schools that crush creativity can be counteracted by extracurriculars that encourage it. The bottom of the social heap in society can be the idol of people that actually appreciate them and have a similar aesthetic.

Which brings us back to having to push for "what could be" if we weren't trying so very damn hard to crush that creative spark by insisting on Right and Wrong as the only two options in school. And if our work allowed us the freedom of creativity (within bounds) to do our work, instead of dictating to us what is Right and Wrong. And if our politics stopped trying to tell us that they were Right and the other side Wrong. We've built up a lot of things that depend on us accepting Right and Wrong as the only ways. So, we both end up being right - I'm pessimistic about our schools ever changing back to something that will teach us about thinking and problem-solving in creative ways, and encouraging creative expression, but bladespark is right that it's only part of the total picture - plenty of kids and adults are able to find an outlet for their creative expression anyway. After all, I'm one of them, as a never-going-to-be-famous blogger.

Comments

[nicki]

I don't believe schools are killing creativity, but I think the potential is there.

The problem is that our society has become a factory system. Everyone has to produce a consistent product, so everyone must do the exact same thing with the exact same resources in order to prevent a variation in product. So basically we get fast food quality products or higher-end chain restaurant quality, but being an Iron Chef in almost every industry (including the educational one) is systematically discouraged. Creativity lends itself well to neither measurability nor consistency.

(also, everything must be suitably bland and inoffensive so that no one's tummy gets too upset)

Freetime creativity, however, may be at a peak. Everyone has more access to free time and resources than probably ever before.

[silveradept]

The factory style of schooling does suggest that it can/does quash creativity, because factories do not have multiple methods for arriving at products and cannot retool effectively without massive investment of time and money.

But yes, there's that tension there between free time creativity with low barriers to entry and creative expression in schools, which aren't really geared to it. Which is why I think birth ideas can be simultaneously true - school crushes, children and adults find a way around it.

[nicki]

There are still art and creative classes that are not subject (as much) to the factory system, which is why I said education isn't killing creativity. However, those classes are less valued and less funded in many districts.

IMO creativity is part of humanity. If we ever lost it entirely, it would be an indication of changing into a new species.